Re: RFR: 8258788: incorrect response to change in window insets [lanai] [v3]

2021-04-12 Thread Alexey Ushakov
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 22:41:37 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: >> Yes, it's IEC61966-2.1 > > Ok, found the issue on my side, by default the test uses the OGL, not a metal. Good news! @mrserb Could you sponsor this pull request? - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3390

Re: RFR: 8256465: [macos11] Java frame and dialog presented full screen freeze application

2021-04-12 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:22:06 GMT, Philip Race wrote: > The system dialog UI talks of "documents" which might tell us something about > the mindset of the folks who designed it. Yes, that was my thinking. This seems like a setting meant for applications whose windows are a set of "documents", a

Re: RFR: 8233567: [TESTBUG] FocusSubRequestTest.java fails on macos

2021-04-12 Thread Alexander Zvegintsev
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:37:31 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: > This test was problemlisted during nightly testing of jdk on macos which > seems to be caused by the fact that proper waiting was not done to make sure > frame is visible before commencing the test, which can be problematic in some

Re: RFR: 8233567: [TESTBUG] FocusSubRequestTest.java fails on macos

2021-04-12 Thread Pankaj Bansal
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:37:31 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: > This test was problemlisted during nightly testing of jdk on macos which > seems to be caused by the fact that proper waiting was not done to make sure > frame is visible before commencing the test, which can be problematic in some

Integrated: 8233567: [TESTBUG] FocusSubRequestTest.java fails on macos

2021-04-12 Thread Prasanta Sadhukhan
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:37:31 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: > This test was problemlisted during nightly testing of jdk on macos which > seems to be caused by the fact that proper waiting was not done to make sure > frame is visible before commencing the test, which can be problematic in some

Integrated: 8258788: incorrect response to change in window insets [lanai]

2021-04-12 Thread Alexey Ushakov
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 23:04:04 GMT, Alexey Ushakov wrote: > Perform replaceSurfaceData on insets change This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 714ae54f Author:Alexey Ushakov Committer: Phil Race URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/714ae54f Stats: 165 lines i

Re: RFR: 8256465: [macos11] Java frame and dialog presented full screen freeze application

2021-04-12 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:22:06 GMT, Philip Race wrote: > The system dialog UI talks of "documents" which might tell us something about > the mindset of the folks who designed it. Yes, that was my thinking. This seems like a setting meant for applications whose windows are a set of "documents", a

Re: RFR: 8256465: [macos11] Java frame and dialog presented full screen freeze application

2021-04-12 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:22:06 GMT, Philip Race wrote: > The system dialog UI talks of "documents" which might tell us something about > the mindset of the folks who designed it. Yes, that was my thinking. This seems like a setting meant for applications whose windows are a set of "documents", a

RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked.

2021-04-12 Thread Alexander Zvegintsev
This fix simply removes tests mentioned in the bug with for unsupported scenarios(applets in browser). - Commit messages: - initial Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3441/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3441&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.o

Re: RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked.

2021-04-12 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:48:06 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote: > This fix simply removes tests mentioned in the bug with for unsupported > scenarios(applets in browser). Please confirm that none of them are in the problem list. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3441

Re: RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked.

2021-04-12 Thread Alexander Zvegintsev
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:23:39 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: > Please confirm that none of them are in the problem list. I do confirm that. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3441

Re: RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked.

2021-04-12 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:48:06 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote: > This fix simply removes tests mentioned in the bug with for unsupported > scenarios(applets in browser). test/jdk/java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyReleasedInAppletTest/KeyReleasedInAppletTest.java line 1: > 1: /* The "TestApplet.java

Re: RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked. [v2]

2021-04-12 Thread Alexander Zvegintsev
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:03:49 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: >> Alexander Zvegintsev has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> TestApplet.java removed > > test/jdk/java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyReleasedInAppletTest/KeyReleasedInAppletTest

Re: RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked. [v2]

2021-04-12 Thread Alexander Zvegintsev
> This fix simply removes tests mentioned in the bug with for unsupported > scenarios(applets in browser). Alexander Zvegintsev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: TestApplet.java removed - Changes: - all: https://git.

Re: RFR: 8039261: [TEST_BUG]: There is not a minimal security level in Java Preferences and the TestApplet.html is blocked. [v2]

2021-04-12 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 01:34:17 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote: >> This fix simply removes tests mentioned in the bug with for unsupported >> scenarios(applets in browser). > > Alexander Zvegintsev has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: >