Hello,
For future CSR requests involving system properties, please document the
properties using these javadoc facilities.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 11/14/2018 2:27 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
This is an FYI to announce some initial, long-overdue support in
javadoc for documenting system properties (
I suspect it might have been a copy-and-paste issue since the
declaration for readObject has those two exception types:
private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream)
throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException;
and (to date) we haven't have programmatic checks of this aspect of the
seri
Hello,
A few classes in awt and beans have writeObject methods declared to
throw extra exception types. The serialization spec requires the
following declaration for a writeObject method:
private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream stream)
throws IOException;
https://docs.oracle.c
PS Discussion of the next iteration of tiered testing:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2015-June/002325.html
Thanks,
-Joe
On 6/24/2015 4:42 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
To support the next iteration of tiered testing in JDK 9, with an eye
toward running client library tests,
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Hi Anthony,
thank you for the tip, I'll try to use realSync(), it seems to be the best
solution.
If the fix is approved by the awt team, I'm happy for the test change to
go back into OpenJDK 6.
-Joe
Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Joe,
The patch looks great. Thanks for fixing that. Approved.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 8/28/2009 12:46 AM Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
I pushed the fix for 6877122 "Many javadoc warnings from
java.awt.Window, other awt classes" into TL:
http://hg.openjd
Greetings.
While doing some other documentation work, I noticed there were dozens
of javadoc build warnings coming out of java.awt.*. I'm submitting the
patch below for your review; the patch corrects all those warnings from
awt,. If approved, I will file a bug and commit the changes back
t
Oleg Sukhodolsky wrote:
Hi,
just a short question:
do we really have to change the launcher? Why we can not add the
changes to AWT's native code (somewhere near LoadLibrary())?
Yes, it would be preferable if the launcher did not change for this.
-Joe
Oleg.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:13
Anthony Petrov wrote:
awt-dev: please review the fix for 6open and 7 at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anthony/6open-1-systemExitNotNeeded-6832386.0/
and
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anthony/7-10-systemExitNotNeeded-6832386.0/
(should admit the webrevs are quite identical :) )
The correspondin
