On 30/01/2019 13:53, Phil Race wrote:
Looks fine. I can only suppose the C++ AwtRobot class existed only
because other peer classes need a C++ native object ?
I guess it was implemented with assumption that the robot
will need to store some data in the native code, but in fact
it was always an
Looks fine. I can only suppose the C++ AwtRobot class existed only
because other peer classes need a C++ native object ?
But I can't think what would break if there's none here ...
-phil.
On 1/11/19 6:45 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk 13.
Bug: https://bugs.open
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk 13.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216318
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8216318/webrev.01
Every java.awt.Robot object register a RobotDisposer which
are responsible to delete the native data of the robot. But
there is no native data