2014-09-03 14:40 GMT-06:00 Alexander Zvegintsev
:
> Actually no action needed from your side, I've created a backport for jdk7
> [1], and it looks like they already have a decision.
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057158
OK. Thanks again for all the help!
-Alex
Alex,
Actually no action needed from your side, I've created a backport for
jdk7 [1], and it looks like they already have a decision.
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057158
--
Thanks,
Alexander.
03.09.2014 23:49, Alex Henrie wrote:
2014-09-03 7:50 GMT-06:00 Alexander Zvegintse
2014-09-03 7:50 GMT-06:00 Alexander Zvegintsev
:
> Sure, your fix should be available in 8u40, as for 7u-dev it will be decided
> by sustaining team.
Thanks! So, should I send the JDK 7 patch to the jdk7u-dev mailing
list for their consideration?
-Alex
Hello Alex,
Sure, your fix should be available in 8u40, as for 7u-dev it will be
decided by sustaining team.
BTW, there is no need to make patches by hand for porting from JDK 9 to
JDK 8u [1].
[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/docs/portingScript.html
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 09/02/2014
Thank you for pushing my patch to JDK 9! Can this fix be backported to
Java 8 and Java 7 as well? The diff below applies cleanly to
jdk8u-dev/jdk and jdk7u-dev/jdk.
-Alex
diff --git a/src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11/XWindow.java
b/src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11/XWindow.java
--- a/src/solaris/cl
The fix looks great to me. +1.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 8/27/2014 8:31 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Hello Alex,
You are welcome and I am glad to see your contribution to OpenJDK project.
Your fix looks good to me, it resolves JDK-6624085 issue too, so let it
be fixed under this bug ID.
Hello Alex,
You are welcome and I am glad to see your contribution to OpenJDK project.
Your fix looks good to me, it resolves JDK-6624085 issue too, so let it
be fixed under this bug ID.
As I can see in jdk9-dev mailing list OCA has been signed by you, so no
further action is required from you
