It is unclear why gdk_scale is applied on top of native scale? So if
both GDK_SCALE and scale-factor are set, then we will get the multiply
of them, is it expected?
On 08.07.16 13:27, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
+1
On 7/8/16 10:37 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
The fix looks good to me.
+1
On 7/8/16 10:37 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 7/8/2016 9:25 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
I have changed variables declaration style in systemScale.c, because
it produced warnings in Solaris build.
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 7/8/2016 9:25 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
I have changed variables declaration style in systemScale.c, because
it produced warnings in Solaris build.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8149115/webrev.03/
--Semyon
On 7/7/2016 9:57 AM,
I have changed variables declaration style in systemScale.c, because it
produced warnings in Solaris build.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8149115/webrev.03/
--Semyon
On 7/7/2016 9:57 AM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 7/6/2016 11:46 PM,
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 7/6/2016 11:46 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Still looks good.
--
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 06.07.2016 21:42, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Thanks, Alexander. Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8149115/webrev.02/
Still looks good.
--
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 06.07.2016 21:42, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Thanks, Alexander. Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8149115/webrev.02/
--Semyon
On 7/6/2016 9:03 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
The fix looks good to me.
Just a minor
Thanks, Alexander. Please see the updated webrev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8149115/webrev.02/
--Semyon
On 7/6/2016 9:03 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
The fix looks good to me.
Just a minor comment: multiple NULL checks in get_schema_value could
be wrapped in CHECK_NULL_RETURN
The fix looks good to me.
Just a minor comment: multiple NULL checks in get_schema_value could be
wrapped in CHECK_NULL_RETURN macro, e.g.:
CHECH_NULL_RETURN(fp_g_settings_schema_has_key
= dlsym(lib_handle, "g_settings_schema_has_key"), NULL);
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 7/6/2016 4:46 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
On 7/6/2016 12:26 PM, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
On 7/5/2016 9:59 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149115
webrev:
On 7/5/2016 9:59 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8149115
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8149115/webrev.00/
Currently the hidpi support on linux only reads GDK_SCALE environment
variable to get the
10 matches
Mail list logo