Hi Remi,
> some files like X11FontManager contain raw types, java.util.Map instead
> of java.util.Map.
>
> Is there a reason ?
Yes. This class is for a big part refactored from the original
sun.fun.FontManager, this is actually quite old code.
/Roman
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Softw
Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 12.25 -0700, Dmitri Trembovetski ha
scritto:
>Yeah, I knew you'll like Phil's changes to that code =)
eh...
I'll try to sync asap. I think we should define a better interface for
the Font code, what we did was just a "wild" refactor, while it would be
nice to h
Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 12.25 -0700, Dmitri Trembovetski ha
scritto:
> Yeah, I knew you'll like Phil's changes to that code =)
eh...
I'll try to sync asap. I think we should define a better interface for
the Font code, what we did was just a "wild" refactor, while it would be
nice to have
Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 13.16 -0700, Dmitri Trembovetski ha
scritto:
>Sorry, I didn't mean to imply you need to sync, I was just
>trying to be funny. I know that Phil's changes touch a bunch of
>the same files you presumably did.
Yeah, I understood! :)
But that's right, I shoul
On Aug 5, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Dmitri Trembovetski wrote:
Hi Roman,
Roman Kennke wrote:
In your case it'd be a webrev between a repo with your
changes vs jdk7 master (assuming your repo is synced with
master so that the webrev doesn't show any changes other
than ones you made).
Actually
Hi Dmitri,
>It'd be awesome if along with all those documents there was a
> webrev [1] for your changes.
For your reviewing pleasure:
http://kennke.org/~roman/cacio-webrev/webrev/
Have fun!
(BTW: awesome tool!)
Cheers, Roman
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, htt
Hi Mario,
Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno mar, 05/08/2008 alle 12.25 -0700, Dmitri Trembovetski ha
scritto:
Yeah, I knew you'll like Phil's changes to that code =)
eh...
I'll try to sync asap. I think we should define a better interface for
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply you need to s
Dmitri Trembovetski wrote:
Actually, our current working repository is a child of jdk7 master,
however, it's using an older version. At some point we had to stop
syncing, otherwise we would not have been able to finish the thing in
time. Unfortunately this means that there are some unsynced chang
Hi Roman,
Roman Kennke wrote:
In your case it'd be a webrev between a repo with your
changes vs jdk7 master (assuming your repo is synced with
master so that the webrev doesn't show any changes other
than ones you made).
Actually, our current working repository is a child of jd
Hi Dmitri,
>It'd be awesome if along with all those documents there was a
> webrev [1] for your changes.
That's true. I will try to generate this.
>In your case it'd be a webrev between a repo with your
>changes vs jdk7 master (assuming your repo is synced with
>master so tha
Hi Mario,
looks pretty good!
It'd be awesome if along with all those documents there was a
webrev [1] for your changes.
In your case it'd be a webrev between a repo with your
changes vs jdk7 master (assuming your repo is synced with
master so that the webrev doesn't show any cha
Dear judges, dear mailing list,
Please find all necessary material (documentation, source code, tests,
etc) to the Caciocavallo project here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/caciocavallo/caciocavallo/raw-file/tip/cacio-docs/index.html
All the source code developed as part of this project is publis
Dear judges, dear mailing list,
Please find all necessary material (documentation, source code, tests,
etc) to the Caciocavallo project here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/caciocavallo/caciocavallo/raw-file/tip/cacio-docs/index.html
All the source code developed as part of this project is publis
Dear judges, dear mailing list,
Please find all necessary material (documentation, source code, tests,
etc) to the Caciocavallo project here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/caciocavallo/caciocavallo/raw-file/tip/cacio-docs/index.html
All the source code developed as part of this project is publis
14 matches
Mail list logo
