On 04/13/2018 12:44 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Phil Race >
schrieb am Fr. 13. Apr. 2018 um 19:21:
I suppose this potentially helps the concurrency of the build ?
I can't think of why this would be a problem now there is no
On 2018-04-13 12:44, Volker Simonis wrote:
Phil Race >
schrieb am Fr. 13. Apr. 2018 um 19:21:
I suppose this potentially helps the concurrency of the build ?
I can't think of why this would be a problem now there is no
Phil Race schrieb am Fr. 13. Apr. 2018 um 19:21:
>
> I suppose this potentially helps the concurrency of the build ?
> I can't think of why this would be a problem now there is no
> compile-time linking
> involved and it seems Linux was already fine without this,
> but a
Yes, we don't want unneeded dependencies declared as it both potentially
slows down the build (though this removal will not have any measurable
impact) as well as confuses humans trying to make sense of the makefiles.
This removal should be fine as we don't link to libawt_xawt on any
platform
Looks good, thanks!
/Erik
On 2018-04-13 09:22, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Erik,
thanks for looking at the patch and good catch! You're right that the
dependency can now be removed. Here's the new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8201524.v1
Regards,
Volker
On Fri, Apr
I suppose this potentially helps the concurrency of the build ?
I can't think of why this would be a problem now there is no
compile-time linking
involved and it seems Linux was already fine without this,
but a jdk-submit would be prudent ..
-phil.
On 04/13/2018 09:22 AM, Volker Simonis
Hi Erik,
thanks for looking at the patch and good catch! You're right that the
dependency can now be removed. Here's the new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8201524.v1
Regards,
Volker
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
Hello Volker,
The change looks good, but now that we no longer link against
libawt_headless, we should also remove the make dependency a few lines
down. (Should have been done already for Solaris.)
/Erik
On 2018-04-13 06:28, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can I please have a review for this
t>
> Subject: RFR(XS): 8201524: [AIX] Don't link libfontmanager
> against libawt_headless
>
> Hi,
>
> can I please have a review for this tiny AIX cleanup:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8201524/
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-820
Hi,
can I please have a review for this tiny AIX cleanup:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8201524/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201524
This is a follow up change of JDK-8196516 which discovered that on AIX
libfontmanager is always linked against libawt_headless at
10 matches
Mail list logo