On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:38:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> [JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
> polling for remote printers.
> That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and
> links to the article which describes the method yet it
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:18:25 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Any idea why RegistryValueChange was rejected as a solution?
I've no idea. I read that comment, it's exactly the comment that was in the
code above `RemotePrinterChangeListener` class in
`PrintServiceLookupProvider.java`.
> RegistryVa
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:38:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> [JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
> polling for remote printers.
> That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and
> links to the article which describes the method yet it
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:30:13 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> I can understand that as a user, you cannot /shouldn't change the name of a
>> remote network printer but a network admin can change the name, so shouldn't
>> we get notification on that name change when this method gets called after
>>
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:38:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> [JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
> polling for remote printers.
> That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and
> links to the article which describes the method yet it
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:38:08 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>>> Is this only about addition/removal? What about printer name change?
>>
>> You cannot change the name of a remote printer.
>>
>> Opening *Printer Properties* dialog from the printer context menu on the
>> local host and editing i
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:29:17 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Is this only about addition/removal? What about printer name change?
>> Shouldn't we get notified in that case as trying to print on printer with
>> old name will not find the printer!!
>> If yes, in that regard I guess REG_NOTIFY_CHANGE
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:55:45 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> Is this only about addition/removal? What about printer name change?
You cannot change the name of a remote printer.
Opening *Printer Properties* dialog from the printer context menu on the local
host and editing its name changes t
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:49:59 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> I also am not sure on this. But I think since this is for remote printer,
>> sometimes network availability issue might be there so it may fail more
>> compared to local printer so I guess we should give this method a fair
>> chance, mo
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:59:55 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> [JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
>> polling for remote printers.
>> That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and
>> links to the article which describes the method ye
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:38:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> [JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
> polling for remote printers.
> That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and
> links to the article which describes the method yet it
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:30:52 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>>> I guess having "FALSE" as fAsynchronous value mean the function does not
>>> return until a change has occurred so do we still need this do-while
>>> monitoring loop?
>>
>> You're right, `FALSE` for `fAsynchronous` means the func
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:54:12 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/WPrinterJob.cpp line 259:
>>
>>> 257: NULL,
>>> 258: FALSE);
>>> 259:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:39:56 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> I guess having "FALSE" as fAsynchronous value mean the function does not
> return until a change has occurred so do we still need this do-while
> monitoring loop?
You're right, `FALSE` for `fAsynchronous` means the function doesn't
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:38:27 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> [JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
> polling for remote printers.
> That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and
> links to the article which describes the method yet it
[JDK-8153732](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153732) implemented
polling for remote printers.
That bug description also mentions watching the registry for changes and links
to the article which describes the method yet it does so in terms of WMI. Using
WMI is not necessary to watch fo
16 matches
Mail list logo
