After having some internal discussions we've decided to set forRemoval to false
as we're not certain which release it will be removed in and it's likely to be
needed in at least 10.
-DrD-
David DeHaven wrote:
David had said,
it seems safer to leave it false for now and revisit marking for removal in 10
I think this means, "set forRemoval=false in 9, set forRemoval=true in 10, and
actually remove it in 11".
I said that in reference to Applet, not JSObject.
> David had said,
>
>> it seems safer to leave it false for now and revisit marking for removal in
>> 10
>
> I think this means, "set forRemoval=false in 9, set forRemoval=true in 10,
> and actually remove it in 11".
I said that in reference to Applet, not JSObject.
I now think JSObject shou
une 08, 2016 3:09 PM
To: Daniil Titov
Cc: David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
That’s right. It requires to add a new doc bundle in the docs
gt;>> s'marks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/8/16 5:34 PM, Daniil Titov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review the new version of the fix for JDK9.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. "forRemo
Dehaven; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
That’s right. It requires to add a new doc bundle in the docs build. What you
did was the right direction. C
true" is added to @Deprecated annotation for
>>>> JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method.
>>>> 2. A new doc bundle for JSObject documentation is added in the docs build.
>>>>
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8156960/jdk/webrev.01
&
arks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
That’s right. It requires to add a new doc bundle in the docs build. What you
did was the right direction. Can you update the
iginal Message-----
>> From: Mandy Chung
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 3:09 PM
>> To: Daniil Titov
>> Cc: David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
>> build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
>> Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Depr
June 08, 2016 3:09 PM
> To: Daniil Titov
> Cc: David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
> build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
> Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate
> JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
>
> That’s right. It requires to add a n
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8156960/webrev.01
>>
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156960
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniil
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mandy Chung
et; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
That’s right. It requires to add a new doc bundle in the docs build. What you
did was the right direction. Can you update the webrev?
FYI. There is an effort under discussion to revisit
regards,
Daniil
-Original Message-
From: Mandy Chung
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:23 AM
To: Daniil Titov
Cc: Erik Joelsson; David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate
: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Daniil Titov wrote:
Thank you, Erik!
Please review the new version of the patch that has "../" fixed:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8156960/jdk/webrev.02
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtit
,
Daniil
-Original Message-
From: Mandy Chung
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:23 AM
To: Daniil Titov
Cc: Erik Joelsson; David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow
Chung
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:23 AM
To: Daniil Titov
Cc: Erik Joelsson; David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Dan
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Daniil Titov wrote:
>
> Thank you, Erik!
>
> Please review the new version of the patch that has "../" fixed:
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8156960/jdk/webrev.02
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8156960/webrev.02/
>
Looks okay. Nit:
ds,
Daniil
-Original Message-
From: Erik Joelsson
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 12:34 AM
To: Daniil Titov; Mandy Chung
Cc: David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; build-dev; build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net;
awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) met
-
From: Mandy Chung
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 3:09 PM
To: Daniil Titov
Cc: David Dehaven; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
That’s right. It r
arks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
That’s right. It requires to add a new doc bundle in the docs build. What you
did was the right direction. Can you update the we
> +#
> # mgmtdocs
> #
>
>
> Best regards,
> Daniil
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David DeHaven
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 1:23 PM
> To: Mandy Chung
> Cc: Daniil Titov; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
> build-infa-
08, 2016 1:23 PM
To: Mandy Chung
Cc: Daniil Titov; Stuart Marks; Erik Joelsson; build-dev;
build-infa-...@openjdk.java.net; awt-dev; Kevin Rushforth
Subject: Re: Review Request: 8156960 Deprecate JSObject.getWindow(Applet) method
How about NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk for javadoc?
Something like:
diff -
Yes, exactly.
-- Kevin
David DeHaven wrote:
Clarification: in a future *as of yet unspecified* release :)
-DrD-
On Jun 8, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Yes, the plan is to deprecate it in 9 and remove it in a future release.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
The client te
Goo.d It should have forRemoval=true in @Deprecated then.
Mandy
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> Yes, the plan is to deprecate it in 9 and remove it in a future release.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The client team owns jdk.jsobject module and so I add
Sorry, we had LIVECONNECT_PKGS previously...
-DrD-
> How about NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk for javadoc?
>
> Something like:
>
> diff --git a/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk b/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk
> --- a/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk
> +++ b/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
>
How about NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk for javadoc?
Something like:
diff --git a/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk b/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk
--- a/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk
+++ b/make/common/NON_CORE_PKGS.gmk
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
org.w3c.dom.events \
org.w3c.dom.views
+JSOBJECT_PKGS = netsca
Clarification: in a future *as of yet unspecified* release :)
-DrD-
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> Yes, the plan is to deprecate it in 9 and remove it in a future release.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The client team owns jdk.jsobject module and so I
Yes, the plan is to deprecate it in 9 and remove it in a future release.
-- Kevin
Mandy Chung wrote:
The client team owns jdk.jsobject module and so I add awt-dev to this thread.
And bcc jdk9-dev.
It is not Java SE API and it should not add to CORE-PKGS.gmk. As for
@Deprecated, I believe
The client team owns jdk.jsobject module and so I add awt-dev to this thread.
And bcc jdk9-dev.
It is not Java SE API and it should not add to CORE-PKGS.gmk. As for
@Deprecated, I believe the plan is to remove the getWindows method in a future
release. Kevin and Dave can confirm.
Mandy
> On
29 matches
Mail list logo
