Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] please help....Purchase Price Variance

2010-05-28 Thread ASHWANI JAIN
Dear, In your case as you mentioned, posting at the time of PO is as follows: Inventory Dr 1 Vendor Cr -1 Purchase Price Variance Dr 1 Inventory Cr -1 The above shows that Standard Cost price is activated. This means the standard cost defined for the Item = 0 and due to this, all

RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Labels change during daily use

2010-05-28 Thread Kim Truelsen
Hi Jens I found the case in our development system. It was not 4.0 but AX 2009 we fixed the issue. The issue is due to a too small buffer to hold the language list. This has been fixed in Kb970865 which is included In RU2 for ax 2009 SP1. Ax 3.0 was not supported since 19. Jan 2009. Have a ni

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Labels change during daily use

2010-05-28 Thread mni_col
Hi Jens, we have same problem with 3.0. We changed the menu items to run the report for e.g. \Menu Items\Output\SalesInvoice from Run on Server to Run on Client. After that we have no problem with language again. Performance is not so good, but better bad performance as printout with wrong lang

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Question on X++ Basics

2010-05-28 Thread mahesh tej
Thanks Pankaj.   Still confusing. Whats wrong with final class <> extends FormRun I personally feel, this makes more sense. Final keyword ensures it to be a sealed class even here. And it also inherits all the basic properties of FormRun. Moreover, when a new form is created, is it creati

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Question on X++ Basics

2010-05-28 Thread Pankaj Gupta
Like any other OO Laungauage X++ also follows all principles of object oriented programming. Every form is an instance of FORMRUN class which is restricted by a keyword FINAL which means it cannot be inherited further.. So it cant form a new instance every time when u create a new form by its name,