Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Regarding Axapta Installation

2005-03-29 Thread panda arabinda
Dear Sir 1. Regarding server and client configuration If you will go to the below link you will come to know that the system configuration required as per your requirement. http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/solutions/strategic_partners/microsoft/axapta_sizing.html 2. Regarding installation

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Hi

2005-03-09 Thread panda arabinda
HI Girish, Thanks for giving idea.But as per your solution the other database should be there in the intranet or not ? I think one application should be able to talk with the other database. is not it ? Regards Arabinda --- Girish Bhatkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi santosh, >Wel

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Hi

2005-03-09 Thread panda arabinda
As your application and as well as database are different in different palces so there is no solution for reflecting any data in both the system automatic. Thanks & Regards Arabinda --- santosh padhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > Hi all, > > My client's requirement is > > there is

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Total Axapta implementation in World

2005-02-03 Thread panda arabinda
Dear Friends, I am very much interested to know few things regarding axapta implementation.Anyone can help me out about this ? 1. Till date through out WORLD how many number of implemenation done in Axapta. 2. Till date through out INDIA how many number of implemenation done in Ax

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Training Centres for Axapta? For gaining Development Expertise

2004-12-29 Thread panda arabinda
Dear Haniappah Abdul For your kind information the Consultants in India have excellent development expertise. You can't give such statements after coming across 1 or 2 developers.I am not atall agree with you. Regards Arabinda --- haniappah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are an year old

Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Ask Axapta exam question

2004-11-30 Thread panda arabinda
Ans. b --- ptmhki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > when is it appropriate to define table relation > directly on table > instead of using EDT > a. when 1 field in a table relates to 1 field in a > another table > b. when multiple fields in a table define 1 relation > to multiple > fields in