Hi,
Could you suggest me how to reject a production order after it crossed the
status estimation.
Regards
B V N Raju
edwardjosling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Found the solution: It is critical that the reversal (BOM) be done
at the exact same cost as the original BOM transaction for both RM
and FG. To accomplish this, I used marking. After reversing the SO,
the ave cost was correct.
--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com,
"edwardjosling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone! Hope someone can share their experience...
>
> A BOM item has been produced using wrong BOM consumption, resulting
> in a hugely inflated average cost. Sales issues have taken place
> with this inflated cost. To correct this issue, we did the
following:
> 1. Reverse the production using BOM journal. (Needed to correct raw
> material consumption)
> 2. Post FG item with correct BOM consumption, thus correct cost.
>
> After these steps, the average costs is still inflated and cost of
> sales overstated. We then continued with the following:
> 3. Reverse sales orders with inflated costs
> 4. Re-invoice at new avg cost
>
> We then still have a wrong average cost price. To correct this, we
> adjusted the receipt transactions (original production orders) to
the
> new cost price (inv management --> periodic --> closing -->
> adjustment --> transactions). The result is a debit to the stock
> adjustment account. After this, we proceed with a recalculation on
> the FG item to correct all transactions (issues) with the correct
> average cost.
>
> Can anyone shed some light if the above process is correct or are
we
> missing something? Although the inventory looks ok, we are not
> convinced that the GL is correct and still need to test the result.
>
> Would appreciate any feedback.
>
> Eddie
>
---------------------------------
Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Click here
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
