Hi Hennie

Check if the specific voucher u are trying to reverse is "marked" again (the 
red hand) in any GL or Payment Journal lines for settlement and left 
unposted.(applicable in case there was partial settlement done before on the 
same voucherand the remaining is settled again). The error will not occur if 
such multiple settlements are posted. 
Hope this helps.

I agree with David that deleting records from a table is no solution.

Regds
Hema Krish


----- Original Message ----
From: "Bonk, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 8:04:24 PM
Subject: RE: »Ø¸´£º [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Settlement reversal

Whenever I select a closed transaction, Axapta selects the associated voucher 
so that it is never unbalanced when the Reverse button is clicked. If you see 
that Axapta does this but still gives you the message below then it is a bug.

However when you start deleting transactions in tables; you are asking for 
problems and this should never be considered a solution. Many tables are 
updated with a single transaction so when you start deleting from only one 
table you are affecting the integrity of the data base.

David

____________ _________ _________ __

From: Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com [mailto:Axapta-Knowledge- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com] On Behalf Of billur_kardas_ 1982
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:50 AM
To: Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com
Subject: Re: »Ø¸´£º [Axapta-Knowledge- Village] Settlement reversal

Hi,

If you have solved this problem without coding, could you tell me 
how..Or was that a bug?

Thanks,

--- In Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com <mailto:Axapta- Knowledge- 
Village%40yahoog roups.com> , William Wei 
<softbase57@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi Hennie,
> 
> I wonder if we can solve this problem with no development? Why 
would thsi happen? Does it a bug?
> 
> William
> People's Republic of China
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Hennie Potgieter <hpotgieter@ ...> дµÀ£º
> Hi,
> 
> We quite often have to reverse payments and general journal 
vouchers that have been settled against a customer (Sales Ledger > 
Customers > Functions > Closed Transaction editing). This 
occasionaly give us problems amongst which
> 1) Voucher ' ' could not be found errors,
> 2) The marked transactions do not balance errors
> are the most frequently encountered.
> 
> Usually I have to go into table.SpecTrans and delete the affected 
records and then redo the reversal. This usually solves the problem.
> 
> Ocasionally however (like now) I find that regardless of the tick 
box status in Closed Transaction editing there exist no records is 
table.SpecTrans. The records do however exist in 
table.CustSettlemen t but never go through to SpecTrans regardless of 
the fact that I tick the records on the Closed Transaction editing 
form. The result is that I cannot reverse any of the settlements. 
It keeps saying Voucher ' ' does not exist.
> 
> Does anyone have any idea how to solve this?
> 
> -*
> Hennie Potgieter
> Senior Business Analyst
> UTi SUN Couriers Division
> Centurion, South Africa
> Cell: 0829208315
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Axapta- Knowledge- Village/ <http://groups. 
> yahoo.com/ group/Axapta- Knowledge- Village/> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Axapta-Knowledge- Village-unsubscr [EMAIL PROTECTED] com <mailto:Axapta- 
> Knowledge- Village-unsubscr ibe%40yahoogroup s.com> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> ÑÅ»¢Ãâ·ÑGÓÊÏ䣭ÖйúµÚÒ»¾øÎÞÀ¬»øÓʼþɧÈų¬´óÓÊÏä
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to