[Axiom-developer] [InstallingMathAction]

2005-11-03 Thread unknown
Changes http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/InstallingMathAction/diff -- \begin{axiom} solve(x^2-4,x) \end{axiom} -- forwarded from http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-devel

RE: [Axiom-developer] StepThrough

2005-11-03 Thread Bill Page
On November 3, 2005 4:42 AM Martin Rubey wrote: > ... > there are hardly any requirements on nextItem. Only > duplicates are forbidden, that's not much. I was referring to: > > only return "failed" after exhausting all elements of the > > domain If you can start with a unique "first" element th

[Axiom-developer] Terms of Surrender (was: BAD tim)

2005-11-03 Thread Bill Page
On November 3, 2005 1:02 PM Tim Daly wrote: > Scott Morrison wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > This is my first posting to this list. I worked at IBM > > Research off and on for 9 years. I'm the primary > > author/designer of the interpreter and HyperDoc, and > > I wrote the first code gener

Re: [Axiom-developer] BAD tim

2005-11-03 Thread root
> Hello everybody, Hey, Scott! > > This is my first posting to this list. I worked at IBM Research off and on > for 9 years. I'm the primary author/designer of the interpreter and > HyperDoc, and I wrote the first code generator and optimizer for Aldor > (then called A#). > > I found Tim's po

Re: [Axiom-developer] BAD tim

2005-11-03 Thread Scott Morrison
Hello everybody, This is my first posting to this list.  I worked at IBM Research off and on for 9 years.  I'm the primary author/designer of the interpreter and HyperDoc, and I wrote the first code generator and optimizer for Aldor (then called A#). I found Tim's posting very interesting, and I

Re: [Axiom-developer] StepThrough

2005-11-03 Thread Martin Rubey
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to the documentation: > > http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/axiom--test--1/src/algebra/CatdefSpad > > StepThrough denotes: > > "A class of objects which can be 'stepped through'. Repeated applications of > \spadfun{nextItem} is guaranteed never