Bill,
in "ANSI Common Lisp" by Paul Graham (ISBN0-13-370875-6) on pp304-309
Graham lists the changes from common lisp to ansi common lisp. axiom
has example code that either violates the new standard (eg in-package)
or duplicates the new standard (destructuring binds) with our own twists.
Axiom is
> Really, I don't want to play with any of this.
It shows.
> I want to use
> computer algebra for theoretical physics. I would prefer if
> heavy lifting was done in a collaborative manner, shared among
> several people. But instead, the suggestion is that I should
> start by studying a textbook
On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:56 PM Jens Axel Søgaard asked:
>
> Page, Bill wrote:
>
> > I guess that learning how to program well in lisp is quite a
> > different thing than learning code re-use in general. In fact
> > Peter Norvig has argued that Lisp is not particularly well
> > suited to
Page, Bill wrote:
I guess that learning how to program well in lisp is quite a
different thing than learning code re-use in general. In fact
Peter Norvig has argued that Lisp is not particularly well suited
to hetrogenuous projects that involve several different kinds of
tools and programmers wi
On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:55 AM Tim Daly Jr. wrote:
> ...
>
> Axiom has been ported by writing compatibility layers that emulate
> the Lisp it was being ported from. At least for the code I
> looked at, it's no more a Common Lisp program than it is a CLTL1
> (a previous semi-standard) p
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/227RandomIntegerIsAStrangeFunction/diff
--
>random() has meaning only if I specify a distribution.
True (but that's a bit arrogant? :-). So the flaw is not in 'random()', but in
the documentation because the distribution is not given. I never said that the
i like the executive summary idea in pamphlet files.
while i feel that complete documentation is important the real
goal of pamphlet files is to write programs for the user rather
than the machine. embedding source code leads to a daunting pile
of documentation. stylistically an "executive summary
On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:53 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> > * it would be very useful - if not necessary - if you
> > provided a one page summary on how to use ALLPROSE for
> > the average A{ldor,xiom} programmer, separate from the
> > complete 225 pages docu
Changes
http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/127BuildingAxiomFromSourceFailsOnMyFedoraCore3/diff
--
===
FAQ 36: Axiom won't build on FC3
===
You need to turn o
Page, Bill would like to recall the message, "[Axiom-developer] doyen".
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
On Monday, November 14, 2005 8:45 AM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> > Subject: lisp webserver
> > From: "Tim Daly Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:29:43 +0100
> >
> > If you want to bolt Lisp onto a webserver, the sweet spot
> > o
Changes
http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/127BuildingAxiomFromSourceFailsOnMyFedoraCore3/diff
--
with September source I have the same problem (still on FC3)
I try to use 'setarch i386 -X make' in vain!
--
forwarded from http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Tim Daly Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 02:11 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is Maxima compiled on GCL as a Common Lisp application?
I don't know. It is possible to compile Maxima on a Common Lisp, but I
don't think that GCL is a complete Common Lisp implementation yet.
Greetings!
Bob McElrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Egad has it been a year already?
>
> I would like to stay.
>
> I agree with Martin that we need to redouble our efforts to obtain
> contributions in exchange for bounties, as there have been none so far.
>
> Posts in relevant newsgroups is
Bob McElrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Egad has it been a year already?
>
> I would like to stay.
>
> I agree with Martin that we need to redouble our efforts to obtain
> contributions in exchange for bounties, as there have been none so far.
>
> Posts in relevant newsgroups is a good idea.
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 02:11 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Is Maxima compiled on GCL as a Common Lisp application?
I don't know. It is possible to compile Maxima on a Common Lisp, but I
don't think that GCL is a complete Common Lisp implementation yet. I
think Raymond Toy was responsible for
Egad has it been a year already?
I would like to stay.
I agree with Martin that we need to redouble our efforts to obtain
contributions in exchange for bounties, as there have been none so far.
Posts in relevant newsgroups is a good idea.
I can post to the feyncalc mailing list. Would that be
That file is not in the allprose distribution. You have to get it from
http://www.hemmecke.de/aldor subpage ALLPROSE. There I list a few style
files that are needed for ALLPROSE.
Maybe I should make my distribution a bit bigger and pack up the other
style files, into the distro. I have not don
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/AxiomMail/diff
--
Hans Peter W�rmli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (1) -> e2:=binomial(n-1,k)/binomial(n,k)
>
> n - 1
> ( )
>k
>(1) ---
>n
> ( )
>k
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
