[Axiom-developer] B#

2005-11-18 Thread Hans Peter Würmli
In "How to Make AXIOM Into a Scratchpad" Jenks and Trager describe "... a new user interface language ..." for Axiom, which they called B# ("B natural") in the article. If it ever had been implemented, it would offer a lot of the language elements at least I would have hoped for in the interpre

[Axiom-developer] infinite loop from Makefile

2005-11-18 Thread root
I'm testing axiom under a variety of common lisps. The Makefile I use does the following: @-echo (load "bookvol5.lisp") | clisp If I get an error, e.g. ** - Continuable Error FUNCALL: undefined function foo If you continue (by typing 'continue): Retry The following restarts are also available:

[Axiom-developer] Free Code Graphing Project

2005-11-18 Thread C Y
Was thinking about visualizing Axiom's source code, and remembered this: http://fcgp.sourceforge.net I'm not quite sure how useful it is, but perhaps it can be adapted to work with Axiom (at the very least, it would make a really cool image for a book cover :-) Just wanted to mention it on the l

Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: [Aldor-l] Ann: ALLPROSE / Suggestions

2005-11-18 Thread Peter Broadbery
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 12:27 -0500, Page, Bill wrote: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:53 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > > > > Martin Rubey wrote: > > > > > * it would be very useful - if not necessary - if you > > > provided a one page summary on how to use ALLPROSE for > > > the average A{ldo

[Axiom-developer] [#236 Clicking on 'Dependents' in HyperDoc Browse crashes HyperDoc] (new)

2005-11-18 Thread anonymous
Changes http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/236ClickingOnDependentsInHyperDocBrowseCrashesHyperDoc/diff -- When I click on the 'Dependents' link in the HyperDoc Browse interface, it always crashes, printing: >> System error: Caught fatal error [memory may be damaged] ... in the t

RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom common lisp

2005-11-18 Thread Bill Page
On November 18, 2005 8:47 AM C Y wrote: > > --- root Tim Daly wrote: > > ... > > now, can we move back to discussing math? > > Sounds good to me - back to the math. > Yes I agree, back to the math! :-) Is anyone interested in discussing the implementation of exact computable reals in Axiom?

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom common lisp

2005-11-18 Thread C Y
--- root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ummmkay... i admit i'm wrong. > > (bad tim puts down his keyboard weapon, > abandons his entrenchment, > and exits the language war) > > now, can we move back to discussing math? Sounds good to me. CY _

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom common lisp

2005-11-18 Thread C Y
--- root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ummmkay... i admit i'm wrong. > > (bad tim puts down his keyboard weapon, > abandons his entrenchment, > and exits the language war) > > now, can we move back to discussing math? Sounds good to me - back to the math. CY __

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom common lisp

2005-11-18 Thread root
ummmkay... i admit i'm wrong. (bad tim puts down his keyboard weapon, abandons his entrenchment, and exits the language war) now, can we move back to discussing math? t ___ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu