[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tar it up and email the works to you if you're eager to try it out.
Might take me a day or two to get done.
Please do. I'd like to read your code.
I'm sure I'll find it helpful.
Tim
You can get it mathbrane.ca/axiom/webax-0.0.1.tar
I hope you find it
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby,
|
| On Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:29 PM you wrote:
| > ...
| > A project might be to have the compiler output spad
| > dependencies --
| > just like GCC is able to output dependencies, which greatly
| > facilitates the tedious part of writing Ma
Gaby,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:29 PM you wrote:
> ...
> A project might be to have the compiler output spad
> dependencies --
> just like GCC is able to output dependencies, which greatly
> facilitates the tedious part of writing Makefiles and
> keeping them in sync; Automake uses it.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| > I am quite sure that all the hundreds of targets in Lattice.pamphlet
| > follow exactly the same pattern. Shouldn't we have a short program that
| > replaces 40,000 Makefile lines???
|
| Two points:
|
| Point 1: Lattice is not used. It is there so that we can cre
Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| The lsp/Makefile.pamphlet file needs a reorganisation. You can quickly
| read the dvi and you'll see that nearly all code chunks that patches gcl
| are in subsubsections of the section "Gnu Common Lisp 2.5.2" and that
| the "gcl-version sta
Hello,
The lsp/Makefile.pamphlet file needs a reorganisation. You can quickly
read the dvi and you'll see that nearly all code chunks that patches gcl
are in subsubsections of the section "Gnu Common Lisp 2.5.2" and that
the "gcl-version stanzas" (definition of targets) are in subsections of
this
Alfredo,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 6:47 PM you wrote:
> Thanks Bill. I will do the testing like you suggested
> me. I wonder if I could install the same version of
> maxima you have on axiom-developer.
Installing the same version might simplify things but
you probably wouldn't learn a
Alfredo,
Yes, the \$ seems to be an artifact of Clisp or of the slightly
newer version of Maxima that you are using. I don't think that
your test necessarily demonstrates that this is the cause of the
current problem but it is something that you will have to deal
with later.
The test that I would
Gaby, Ralf,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:41 PM Gaby wrote:
>
> Ralf Hemmecke writes:
>
> | I strongly opt for just ONE archive. The book project
> | should live in the src/doc directory of the Gold/Silver
> | sources. Otherwise we are speaking about Axiom sources
> | and exclude the Axiom bo
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| I strongly opt for just ONE archive. The book project should live in the
| src/doc directory of the Gold/Silver sources. Otherwise we are
| speaking about Axiom sources and exclude the Axiom book.
I agree. I'm a bit disappointed that we don't br
Hello
Actually, the up-to-date book volumes are in
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/book--main--1
I hope this book--main--1 and the tla archive are synchronised.
Otherwise there will be again confusion.
And why don't other people give there opinion about whether to have two
projects like G
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:05 PM I wrote:
> ...
> I edited the GCLOPTS in Makefile from
> --enable-maxpage=256*1024
> to
> --enable-maxpage=196*1024
> resulting in
>
> GCLOPTS=--enable-vssize=65536*2 --enable-statsysbfd \
> --enable-maxpage=196*1024
>
Of course what I real
Camm,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:59 PM you wrote:
>
> Greetings! FYI, just committed the removal of the
> power of 2 constraint on maxpage in both cvs head and
> version 2.6.8pre.
>
Thanks for looking into this.
I just grabbed 2.6.8pre from cvs into a temp directory and
created a replace
> I am quite sure that all the hundreds of targets in Lattice.pamphlet
> follow exactly the same pattern. Shouldn't we have a short program that
> replaces 40,000 Makefile lines???
Two points:
Point 1: Lattice is not used. It is there so that we can create the
lattice of the algebra code for d
> I have experimented with the AXIOM Groebner bases package and was somehoe
> wondering how to define an ordering and how to define elimination orders.
> In the code I couldn't find any hint how to impose these conditions and
> groebner() takes as input only a list of polynomials, not an order
> fu
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Greetings! FYI, just committed the removal of the power of 2
| constraint on maxpage in both cvs head and version 2.6.8pre.
That is good news!
Thanks,
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-develop
Greetings! FYI, just committed the removal of the power of 2
constraint on maxpage in both cvs head and version 2.6.8pre.
Take care,
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:21 PM you wrote:
> > ...
> > Bill Page wrote:
> > >
> > > NULL_OR_ON_C_S
Alfredo,
I see you are using the Clisp verision of Maxima.
I suppose that might create some minor differences.
In my experience the error message "Maxima output parse
error" is most generated if for some reason the routine
'renderMaxima' in 'maximaWrapper.py' is not able to split
the maxima outpu
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:23 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Are the modifications that Frithjof is going to make to
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/axiom--test--1 also sent
> to the axiom-developer mailing list so that we all can
> watch?
Actually, the up-to-date book volumes are in
http:/
Greetings!
I have a trial version there now which eliminates the power of two
constraint. Am testing locally before committing, but you might want
to too. The issue here, as you recall, is that your machine for some
reason is placing the stack below the 0x4000 mark. I could get a
build with
Hi Bill,
Are the modifications that Frithjof is going to make to
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/axiom--test--1 also sent to the
axiom-developer mailing list so that we all can watch?
I still don't like the diff-format. So all those mathaction mails are
actually nearly like spam to me. (But
Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I consider this a completely acceptable policy and I would like
> to encourage you (and others) to continue to make these changes.
> As the saying goes: Be Bold!
I'll try. But please let me know if make changes you don't like or
consider unnecessary. I welc
Alfredo,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:39 AM you wrote:
>
> On 8/9/06, Bill Page wrote:
>
> > If you have a test version of Doyen with Maxima installed,
> > you should be able to add the new interface scripts very
> > easily.
>
> I just finished installing Maxima on my test version of Doyen.
>
Page, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks to this wonderful suggestion the new Maxima interface
> on MathAction is looking pretty good! :)
>
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandBoxMaxima
>
> I modified the texmacs-maxima-5.9.2.lisp code a little to emit
> XML-style tags instead of the TeXmac
On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:02 PM Bob McElrath wrote:
> Use the texmacs scripts directly, and modify them...
>
> echo "integrate(x^2,x);" | maxima -p \
>
/usr/share/texmacs/TeXmacs/plugins/maxima/lisp/texmacs-maxima-5.9.2.lisp
\
> > integral.txt
>
> Note that the texmacs inserts a lot of c
25 matches
Mail list logo
