We are already using 4 different source code control systems in
the Axiom project (CVS, ARCH, SVN, DARCS) and no one is entirely
happy with any one of them, so what's the harm in considering
yet another? :-)
Gaby uses SVK to access our SVN archive. ;-)
Seriously, who is using CVS? Should we con
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki
We are already using 4 different source code control systems in
the Axiom project (CVS, ARCH, SVN, DARCS) and no one is entirely
happy with any one of them, so what's the harm in considering
yet another? :-)
Mercurial (Hg) has been getting some very good revi
> Hello,
> As we get started with Scientific Linux we are just checking as people
> sign up for the development mailing list what is bringing them to
> Scientific Linux.
> Would you mind sharing what your interest is in Scientific Linux?
I'm the lead developer on Axiom. Axiom was originally dev
Martin,
On September 15, 2006 1:00 PM you wrote:
>
> Bill Page writes:
>
> > Yes, there is a time-limit of 1 minute for Axiom on MathAction
> > to prevent any problems where a run-away process hangs the whole
> > system.
> >
> > Can you think of why it might take more than a minute to compile
>
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> I think you are right. SourceForge seems to be having ongoing
> network problems. I still can not access the compile farm.
Good; sorta. At least it's not just me, I've been trying to access it
all week. I seem to recall recently reading that there a
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin,
>
> Yes, there is a time-limit of 1 minute for Axiom on MathAction
> to prevent any problems where a run-away process hangs the whole
> system.
>
> Can you think of why it might take more than a minute to compile
> that page? If absolutely necess
Kai,
Thanks for your quick reply. I can not send a mail to you, gmx.de does
not accept mails from my ISP, so I send it here. In fact I wanted to
know why you think that _Axiom is somewhat 'unfriendly' to program_,
but in general and not only about interfacing with textual chatters. I
misundersto
Martin,
Yes, there is a time-limit of 1 minute for Axiom on MathAction
to prevent any problems where a run-away process hangs the whole
system.
Can you think of why it might take more than a minute to compile
that page? If absolutely necessary I can temporarily relax this
restriction.
Regards,
B
Camm,
On September 15, 2006 11:31 AM you wrote:
>
> Can we finalize this stat bit please? I'm trying to get 2.6.8
> out ...
>
Great!
> In addition to knowing whether enough information is provided,
> I need to know if it works on windows, macosx, and any other
> proprietary system of interest.
Greetings!
Can we finalize this stat bit please? I'm trying to get 2.6.8 out
In addition to knowing whether enough information is provided, I need
to know if it works on windows, macosx, and any other proprietary
system of interest.
Take care,
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G
Probably Tim and Bill extend on the idea. That should be: Probably Tim and Bill can explain the Doyen idea better. :-) Alfredo
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
William,> Just out of curiosity, what were the issues with colinux that forced
> you into using live Linux CD's, vmware, etc.?I never used colinux. The Doyen CD is based on Tim Daly's idea of a collaborative science platform: http://daly.axiom-developer.org/doyen/
. The goal of the project is to
On September 15, 2006 10:51 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> Kai Kaminski writes:
> ...
> | > http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/014315.html
> | Ok, I guess it is about the fact that ANSI CL doesn't require
> | IEEE-754 floating point? Maybe I'm dense, but I don't get
> | what you'r
Kai Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| >http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2006/014315.html
| Ok, I guess it is about the fact that ANSI CL doesn't require
| IEEE-754 floating point? Maybe I'm dense, but I don't get what you're
| trying to say (seriously).
the claimed por
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On September 15, 2006 4:27 AM Martin Rubey wrote:
> >
> > unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work yet. How can I make MathAction
> > compile a pamphlet?
>
> ??? What do you mean by "compile"?
>
> Perhaps you expected that the SPAD code embedded in the pa
Kai,
On September 15, 2006 4:56 AM you wrote:
>
> the build of Gold (--patch-50) fails for me. The first problem is that
> the X11 headers aren't found, which can be overcome by adding
> -I/usr/X11R6/include to CCF in the Makefile.linux chunk in the
> toplevel Makefile.pamphlet.
>
> Now it fails
On September 15, 2006 4:27 AM Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work yet. How can I make
> MathAction compile a pamphlet?
??? What do you mean by "compile"?
Perhaps you expected that the SPAD code embedded in the pamphlet
file would be "compiled" the same way that
\be
hmmm, something bogus going on with the databases...
clearly this needs to be fixed.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Dear Tim, Alfredo,
I just succeeded building as outlined below. Concerning the HyperDoc issue, all
constructors except those in the last layer are known now abbreviated and
spelled out. The ones in the last layer are known only spelled
out. Unfortunately, HyperDoc crashes on GUESSINT and GUESSP wi
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kai Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > | > | Yeah, most of those conditionals are what make the C code hard to
> port.
> | > | >
> | > | > no harder than the lisp non-portable sutff all
Dear Tim, Dear Alfredo!
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> got it. working on it. --t
great. A hint: I meanwhile found a (terrible) workaround. But this way I
probably won't get Alfredo to build Axiom :-(
Alfredo: it turned out that I can burn my CD's on Sunday afternoon European
time. So there
Kai Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > | > | Yeah, most of those conditionals are what make the C code hard to
port.
| > | >
| > | > no harder than the lisp non-portable sutff all over the place in the
| > | > Axiom source code. I don't thi
got it. working on it. --t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pls tar up your copy of the spad code and i'll wrestle with it.
> i don't know the answer off the top of my head so it will take
> some work. --t
Would be really great!
alfredo.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
mantepse depends on fffg and rec
the con
pls tar up your copy of the spad code and i'll wrestle with it.
i don't know the answer off the top of my head so it will take
some work. --t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-deve
Yet another question:
I just noticed that the constructor RINTERP is not found by HyperDoc, only the
operation it exports.
After using one of the operations, RationalInterpolation is found, but RINTERP
still isn't.
Tim, you added RINTERP some months ago into the user layer. I suspect that one
s
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | Yeah, most of those conditionals are what make the C code hard to port.
> | >
> | > no harder than the lisp non-portable sutff all over the place in the
> | > Axiom source code. I don't think we have a perfect language match
> | > here in terms
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Tim, *
do I have to modify the daase files if I add two algebra files, one depending
on the other?
Martin
>
> I'm having problems adding algebra.
>
> I have a package FiniteAbelianMonoidRingFunctions2, short FAMR2, and another
> one, FractionFre
Kai Kaminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On September 14, 2006 9:42 PM you wrote:
| > | > >
| > | > > > > > As far as I can see PLF is defined in Makefile.pamphlet
| > | > > but never
| > | > > > > >
Dear Bill,
unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work yet. How can I make MathAction compile a
pamphlet?
It seems that RECOP and the constructors in fffg.spad were compiled, but those
from mantepse weren't. Furthermore, I had to fix a typo in RECOP, but I didn't
manage to recompile it. Could you plea
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On September 14, 2006 9:42 PM you wrote:
> | > >
> | > > > > > As far as I can see PLF is defined in Makefile.pamphlet
> | > > but never
> | > > > > > used anywhere in the source.
> | > > > > >
> | > > > > > I
31 matches
Mail list logo
