root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Sometimes it fails, sometimes it doesn't. Mostly luck.
| Today isn't my lucky day.
I think you can
(1) classify SF/SVN as broken;
(2) suffer the pain of initial checkout with SVK, and enjoy the rest
seamlessly;
(3) posit there is something b
CY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| > you'll notice that the makefile in the src/boot directory explicitly
| > translates using the BOOTSYS image which contains the 'shoe' parser.
| > the makefile in the src/interp directory explicitly translates using
| > the DEPSYS image which only contains
my console log.
svn co https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/magnus/branches/daly magnus
checkout out a bunch of files
svn: REPORT request failed on '/svnroot/magnus/!svn/vcc/default'
svr: REPORT of '/svnroot/magnus/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read response
body: Secure connection truncated
On Sunday 01 October 2006 21:42, root wrote:
> thus it seems there are 2 boot languages implemented (but not defined).
> my belief (but i don't remember) is that the src/boot directory came
> into being as part of the process of switching to the new boot/shoe
> language.
Yipe. This makes the cmu
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On September 30, 2006 10:36 PM Gaby wrote:
| > ...
| > Assume I have an issue with how boottocl works, which version am
| > I supposed to modify? I'm talking of the system as it currently
| > is -- not how it could theoretically be.
| >
|
| If you were
> * Saying 'svn isn't ready for primetime' is mildly amusing to me. I'm
> one of subversion's original designers, and the system has been
> evolving for 6 years now. Apache, GCC, KDE, Gnome, Samba, and nearly
> every project started within the last 3 years uses it. Sourceforge
> and Google offer
Thanks!
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
> Where are the source files for the "old" boot compiler located, and
> where are the source files for the "new".
>
> I know you said "new" is meaningless, but apparently we have may have
> at least two boot compiler, one "old, and one "new". Which is which?
you believe i know the answer to t
Tim --
Where are the source files for the "old" boot compiler located, and
where are the source files for the "new".
I know you said "new" is meaningless, but apparently we have may have
at least two boot compiler, one "old, and one "new". Which is which?
-- Gaby
_
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On September 30, 2006 10:36 PM Gaby wrote:
| > ...
| > Assume I have an issue with how boottocl works, which version am
| > I supposed to modify? I'm talking of the system as it currently
| > is -- not how it could theoretically be.
| >
|
| If you were
On September 30, 2006 10:36 PM Gaby wrote:
> ...
> Assume I have an issue with how boottocl works, which version am
> I supposed to modify? I'm talking of the system as it currently
> is -- not how it could theoretically be.
>
If you were planning to change anything significant in Boot
I would
Earlier I wrote:
>
> But the 'svnsync sync' command says:
>
> $ svnsync --non-interactive sync file:///home/page/axiom_sync
>
> svnsync: REPORT request failed on
> 'https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/axiom'
> svnsync: The requested report is unknown.
> ...
Ok, the following worked, startin
On October 1, 2006 1:39 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Bill Page wrote:
>
> | that using subversion with the Axiom project is a viable. To a
> | first time user like me who has previous experience with a tool
> | like darcs, subversion seems overly complicated, especially when
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Bill Page wrote:
| that using subversion with the Axiom project is a viable. To a
| first time user like me who has previous experience with a tool
| like darcs, subversion seems overly complicated, especially when
| SVK is layered on top.
Hmm, I find SVK an excellent interfac
Ben,
On October 1, 2006 9:26 AM you wrote:
>
> On 9/30/06, Bill Page wrote:
>
> > So this confirms that 'svk smerge' does not re-create the
> > repository in the same compact form in which it exists on
> > SourceForge. :-(
> >
>
> Another experiment you can try: subversion 1.4 now ships with a
Hello,
@@ -4333,7 +4332,7 @@
(spadlet plist (getalist (caar fenv) v))
(cond
(plist
- (|clearCmdparts| (cons '|propert| (cons v nil)))
+ (|clearCmdParts| (cons '|propert| (cons v nil)))
To trigger this er
Hello *,
I've compiled axiom--main--1--patch-50 on a current Gentoo box, and it
works. However, when I say, for example,
draw(sin(x),x=0..10)
I get a window with the title
sin x
centered at the top, axes, and no curve. In the axion session I get
Warning: could not get the 6x10 font for unitFont
On 9/30/06, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So this confirms that 'svk smerge' does not re-create the repository
in the same compact form in which it exists on SourceForge. :-(
Another experiment you can try: subversion 1.4 now ships with a
mirroring tool called 'svnsync'. Try using 's
18 matches
Mail list logo
