Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Tim --
|
| I have a question about a difference in "load" behaviour bewteen a
| clean lisp image (GCL), and depsys (and any image derived from it).
|
| In a clean image, when I say '(load "foo")', Lisp will try to search
| from the current directory
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| the checkout worked for me also, once i used the correct repository path.
this moment must be celebrated :-)
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listin
the checkout worked for me also, once i used the correct repository path.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Tim --
I have a question about a difference in "load" behaviour bewteen a
clean lisp image (GCL), and depsys (and any image derived from it).
In a clean image, when I say '(load "foo")', Lisp will try to search
from the current directory -- just what is expected.
However, depsys will start sear
"Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13 Oct 2006 05:54:44 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| > | SVK smerge seems like a good option. And it can be used in both
| > | directions if we decide we also want
On 13 Oct 2006 05:54:44 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| SVK smerge seems like a good option. And it can be used in both
| directions if we decide we also want to merge changes at the Google
| repostiory back to the repository on
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| SVK smerge seems like a good option. And it can be used in both
| directions if we decide we also want to merge changes at the Google
| repostiory back to the repository on SourceForge.
Hey, if you decide two-way checking please do let me know so t
Doing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sandbox$ svn co http://code.google.com/p/axiom/source
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/p/axiom/source'
svn: PROPFIND of '/p/axiom/source': 400 Bad Request (http://code.google.com)
but this is not the address to the repository. Probably it was not
clear on previous ema
Alfredo,
On October 12, 2006 11:57 AM you wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Wondering if you are back from Sage Days, and how did it go?
Yes, I am back. I would say that it went "well". And I have a
lot more to write about it when I have more time and energy -
maybe tomorrow.
In short: The Sage develope
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
>> http://code.google.com/p/axiom/source
>
> My attempt to check out this code fails with:
>
> svn: PROPFIND request failed on /p/axiom/source
> svn: PROPFIND of '/p/axiom/source': 400 Bad Request (http://code.google.com)
I've had no problem with
# svn checkou
> > Does this mean that the Axiom sources are available from Google?
> > (I have been unable to use svn to check out from the silver repository
> > at Sourceforge for a while.) If so, how do you do it?
>
> http://code.google.com/p/axiom/source
My attempt to check out this code fails with:
svn:
On 10/12/06, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My fear is that represents some
basic and persistent flaw in SVN - however unlikely that might seem
since SVN is now rather mature and widely used. But not everyone is
trying to use SVN with the https/webdav protocol...
Actually, securityspace r
Alfredo,
On October 12, 2006 11:59 AM you wrote:
>
> Do you have plans on how to keep SourceForge and Google in Sync.
> I see some people on the list asking about this and to put links
> in MathAction.
>
> If you want me to take care of this let me know.
>
If you could update the wiki with lik
Tim --
The file g-boot.boot (and similar ones from src/interp/) contains a
cache of the translated code to Common Lisp, with the note:
Note that the {\bf g-boot.boot.pamphlet} file contains both the
original {\bf boot} code and a saved copy of the {\bf g-boot.clisp}
code. We need to k
14 matches
Mail list logo
