Re: [Axiom-developer] viewport in build-improvements

2006-10-28 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
On 10/28/2006 06:22 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: Ralf Hemmecke wrote: To make it what I did, I included my commands in /trunk/axiom/ChangLog (date 2006-09-13 and 2006-09-14). I must have thought that these commands might be useful in the future. ;-) That should help. I first tried fully autom

[Axiom-developer] Bug?

2006-10-28 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
Does somebody know what happens here? Ralf )expose PrimitiveElement primitiveElement([x^2-2,x^2-3]$List(Polynomial Fraction Integer),[z2,z3]) >> Error detected within library code: (1 . failed) cannot be coerced to mode (OrderedVariableList (z2 z3 %A)) __

[Axiom-developer] Re: freeing Aldor (was: closing bug reports)

2006-10-28 Thread Martin Rubey
Dear Bill, "Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin, > > On Friday, October 27, 2006 4:42 PM you wrote: > > ... > > BTW, I think that issuetracker really needs one improvement: > > we need to be able to run old versions of axiom there. Many > > many of the bug reports are strange to

Re: [Axiom-commit] [Axiom-developer] $erase (Re: SF.net SVN: axiom: [209] trunk3)

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | | You're using code which is not Gold. I suspect he's aware of that. | The silver code, from any source, has NOT been tested. | I resisted making these changes public for a long time, | keeping them local until I ran tests and released them. | | It was

Re: [Axiom-developer] def.lisp

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | During the march to code release to NAG we "hid" some commands. ! | This one probably got hidden. Practically speaking all that means | is that we took it off the command list but it can still be reached | by typing: | | )lisp (|tr| fn) | | which is wh

Re: [Axiom-developer] $erase (Re: [Axiom-commit] SF.net SVN: axiom: [209] trunk3)

2006-10-28 Thread root
> Grrr... you broke my code... and you introduced some bugs :-) > > Here you affect a pathname to filearg but you will use delete-directory > with this pathname as argument. delete-directory want a string since its > code is: > > (defun delete-directory (dirname) >(system (concat "rm -r " di

Re: [Axiom-developer] def.lisp

2006-10-28 Thread root
> > In util.lisp, oldParserAutoloadOnceTrigger seems not to have been > > called: > > > > (defun |tr| (fn) > > (|oldCompilerAutoloadOnceTrigger|) > > (|browserAutoloadOnceTrigger|) > > (|spad2AsTranslatorAutoloadOnceTrigger|) > > (|convertSpadFile| fn) ) > > > > Howeve

Re: [Axiom-developer] def.lisp

2006-10-28 Thread Waldek Hebisch
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > In util.lisp, oldParserAutoloadOnceTrigger seems not to have been > called: > > (defun |tr| (fn) > (|oldCompilerAutoloadOnceTrigger|) > (|browserAutoloadOnceTrigger|) > (|spad2AsTranslatorAutoloadOnceTrigger|) > (|convertSpadFile| fn) ) > > Ho

Re: [Axiom-developer] paths to viewport in build-improvements

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | +The [[.pht]] files contain hardcoded pathnames to viewport directiries ^ s/directiries/directories/ | +in the installed system. Of course, that is asking for trouble. During

Re: [Axiom-developer] [build-improvements] Espace Lisp Esapce character in newfort.boot

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | perhaps you should include this email explanation in the | source file comments. I'm currently expanding on the documentation of Boot, and that includes this particular case. -- Gaby ___ Axiom-developer mailing li

[Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-commit] SF.net SVN: axiom: [226] branches/build-improvements/src/interp

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gaby, | | * newfort.boot.pamphlet (updateSymbolTable): Escape ! in names. | | why is this necessary (or even correct?). See the explanation I gave on axiom-developer list. | the code occurs in a | chunk and there is no need to escape latex symbols i

Re: [Axiom-developer] paths to viewport in build-improvements

2006-10-28 Thread Waldek Hebisch
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Please add in the main pamphlet file, an explanation of why we need > the sed transformation. Some along the line of > > Please expand as necessary, but we do need an explanation of why we > are doing that. > > > | diff -ru build-improvements.bb/src/hyper/Makefile.in

Re: [Axiom-developer] [build-improvements] Espace Lisp Esapce character in newfort.boot

2006-10-28 Thread root
ah. i should learn to read ALL my mail before replying. perhaps you should include this email explanation in the source file comments. t ___ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-develo

[Axiom-developer] $erase (Re: [Axiom-commit] SF.net SVN: axiom: [209] trunk3)

2006-10-28 Thread Vanuxem Grégory
Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 22:23 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Revision: 209 > http://svn.sourceforge.net/axiom/?rev=209&view=rev > Author: billpage > Date: 2006-10-26 22:23:36 -0700 (Thu, 26 Oct 2006) > [...] > 20060906 cxm src/interp/nlib.lisp (and (directory filearg...

Re: [Axiom-developer] def.lisp

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | In principle "user" can type-in parse tree by hand and call the translator. | > | More realistically, one can add code which directly generates Spad like | > | parse trees and then calls translator to output Aldor. | | potentially aldor can also generate th

Re: [Axiom-developer] paths to viewport in build-improvements

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | Please expand as necessary, but we do need an explanation of why we | are doing that. I forgot to add: Please, send a new patch to the list with ChangeLog entry. -- Gaby ___ Axiom-developer maili

[Axiom-developer] [build-improvements] Espace Lisp Esapce character in newfort.boot

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Hi, This patchlet fixes a thinko in src/interp/newfort.boot. The short explanation is that the use of "!" does not math the "specification" in src/boot/Makefile The standard identifiers start with a letter (a-z or A-Z) dollar sign (\$), question mark (?), or the percent sign (%), and are

Re: [Axiom-developer] paths to viewport in build-improvements

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I looked at hypertex pages and AFAICS I can use a simple sed script | > | in a loop to fix paths in .pht files: | > | | > | sed 's,/doc/viewports/,/share/viewports/,g' |

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom-silverbranch for linux (libXpm.a not at the right place)

2006-10-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Francois Maltey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > On my debian testing I have X11/gnome running but I must install | > headers files for x11 and xt packages. | > | > apt-get install libx11-dev | > apt-get install libxt-dev | > | > I began to compile 2 hours ago and the main make works without

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom-silverbranch for linux (libXpm.a not at the right place)

2006-10-28 Thread Waldek Hebisch
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > > On my debian testing I have X11/gnome running but I must install > > headers files for x11 and xt packages. > > > > apt-get install libx11-dev > > apt-get install libxt-dev > > > > I began to compile 2 hours ago and the main make works without

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom-silverbranch for linux (libXpm.a not at the right place)

2006-10-28 Thread Francois Maltey
> On my debian testing I have X11/gnome running but I must install > headers files for x11 and xt packages. > > apt-get install libx11-dev > apt-get install libxt-dev > > I began to compile 2 hours ago and the main make works without complains. But I get a new error. The file isn't in the rig

Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom-silverbranch for linux.

2006-10-28 Thread Francois Maltey
Hello Gabriel and everybody. > | The previous step is right. > > OK, great. > > | Now make complains there is no X11/Xlib.h file. > > Ah. Now, we need to know more about your system. :-( On my debian testing I have X11/gnome running but I must install headers files for x11 and xt packages.