Well, I've looked at and tried Leo.
I'm afraid that my opinions are rather worthless with respect to Leo
for two reasons.
First, I'm a "primitivist" (that is, someone who thinks that people
should be able to send email using a bare CAT5 cable and a battery) so
IDE-like tools are not considered u
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Linux Torvalds talks about Git at Google.
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Ralf,
On May 18, 2007 7:47 PM you wrote:
> ...
> Oh, maybe I made a big mistake. By "pamphlet idea" I did *not*
> refer to the production of a monolithic 1000 pages book, but
> rather on the view that documentation is more important than
> code.
Ok. I understand that.
>
> I know that the "clon
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| NAG cdrom contains file called boot.notes describing Shoe. Another
| copy of this text was buried in the ccl sources and removed when ccl
| was removed. This text is both about language and translator. The test
| is shot and lacks many details, some
Sorry about yesterday, these links work for me now.
CY
--- C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone looked at this?
>
> MathEdit, A Browser-based Visual Mathematics Expression Editor
> http://wme.cs.kent.edu/mathEdit_final.pdf
> http://wme.cs.kent.edu/mathedit/
>
> I wonder if this work wou
NAG cdrom contains file called boot.notes describing Shoe. Another
copy of this text was buried in the ccl sources and removed when ccl
was removed. This text is both about language and translator. The test
is shot and lacks many details, some things there may be out of date,
some explanations d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(note: copied to the axiom mailing list)
Dustin,
Dustin,
Can you write into a tag?
The Axiom project is planning to replace the
help browser and graphics with a standard firefox front end. Axiom is
written in common lisp.
Hello Tim,
At the moment, Kamen
--- Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the point of view
> Leo is that that the outline view is more powerful and more
> flexible than that and so the woven result is of considerable
> lesser importance.
I think this might come down to how much "domain knowledge" is expected
of the person
Hi Bill,
In particular, if I read (4) I come to the conclusion that using
LEO might rather be counterproductive to our pamphlet idea.
As far as I recall, our current exchange about Leo originated in my
reply to Tim's post concerning "Knuth's literate style":
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/h
Ralf,
On May 18, 2007 1:50 PM you wrote:
>
> I've just stumbled over the following section in LEO's User
> Guide.
Yes, I was going to specifically recommend that you read this
section.
>
> How Leo Changes the Notion of Literate Programming
> ==
>
I believe noweb is first of all an external format for Leo.
To get a noweb file from Leo you use export. Leo does however
implement some things that seem motivated by noweb.
Hi Bill,
I've just stumbled over the following section in LEO's User Guide.
How Leo Changes the Notion of Literate Progr
--- Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for info. Yes, as of 1.0.4 declarations in two-arg-gcd are
> blatantly wrong. I must say that it is strange that the code works
> at all (C compiler would immediatly punish them with non-working
> code). I also looked at SBCL CVS repository
Gregory Vanuxem wrote:
> Le lundi 14 mai 2007 ? 01:08 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit
>
> [...]
>
> > 3) The reclos test do not finish, it looks that
> >
> > relativeApprox(squareDiff8,10**(-3))::Float
> >
> > line goes into infinite loop.
>
> Does
>
> )lis (gcd 8 most-negative-fixnum)
>
> re
13 matches
Mail list logo
