Sorry, I forgot to mention two things, lest somebody follows your
argumentation:
> If Waldek, Gaby and Bill leave entirely, what would happen? First they need
> to re-establish the entire data-base for the website and create a new one.
No. Ralf has already agreed to me that it would be possible t
Dear William,
thanks for your long reply. However, it seems to me that you missed that Tim
submitted patches yesterday (and several times before) that
* break the system
* are not documented
* and against which several people (yesterday: Ralf and myself) protested
against *before* Tim commit
Dear Martin:
Thanks for your trust in me and I also value your deep
investment in the Axiom project and don't want to see you
(or anyone else) leave.
I am truly sorry that the community has split up like this,
all due to my naive believe that Tim was willing to really
do according to a "vote" on
Indeed, I was thinking about adding to developernotes as well.
Its a personal wish that GIT was a bit more widely used, thus enabling
an arbitrary number of topic branches so that we can all participate
in specific efforts together.
But perhaps it is not such a difficult thing, as I am not famil
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings! The disassemble bug we saw earlier (end of file) is due to
> a redefinition of compiler::gazonk-name somewhere in your tree. (We
> now have a different format for temporary file names.)
>
> Would it be possible to summarize any gcl lisp func
As these discussions proceed I'm trying to write up the details we
discover in the developer notes so other people can follow when these
things come up again. I'd like make a whole section devoted to a
couple interesting domains (e.g. Integer, DHMATRIX), peel them open
completely, and show exactly
Tim,
Thanks so much for the details! In some ways, I was aware of the
objects you detail, but am still working on the mental model that
might actually lead so some sort of understanding. Your writeup was
most helpful in that regard!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
> )lisp (setq *miss* t)
This
Greetings! The disassemble bug we saw earlier (end of file) is due to
a redefinition of compiler::gazonk-name somewhere in your tree. (We
now have a different format for temporary file names.)
Would it be possible to summarize any gcl lisp functions for which
patching/redefinition is felt necess
Steven,
The function |Integer| is defined in int/algebra/INT.lsp.
The first time the function is executed it replaces itself in the
$ConstructorCache. The real |Integer| function is called |Integer;|
This function constructs the domain $
All of the function lookup for the function in Integer are
Greetings! This should be working now, though the fix could be
better. Please let me know if problems persist.
Take care,
Stephen Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Camm,
>
> Stephen Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Greetin
Hello William,
This is excellent! Thanks for all the work here!
I am going to keep going over these issues, and do my best to think
about the possible solutions. I will just mention the things which I
can make a bit of sense of at the moment.
William Sit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> ) i
William, Stephen,
In the src/doc/developernotes.pamphlet (mnt/linux/doc/developernotes.dvi)
you'll find a section on Axiom Internal Representation that might be of
interest.
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.
Stephen Wilson wrote:
> William Sit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In summary, we need:
> >
> >
> > (1) make a list or set of domains from SetCategory (or any category) a
> > legal construction
> > (2) SetAsDomain to convert a list or set of domains (or elements, or maps,
> > perhaps or
> > cat
Greetings, and thanks! The problem is that the global entries to the
functions returning double float etc. are not being writtin into
DFLOAT.c. I'm trying to debug by reproducing the compile-file step on
DFLOAT.lsp. This fails at the lisp prompt:
(compile-file "DFLOAT.NRLIB/DFLOAT.lsp")
; (DEF
Ralf, Martin,
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2007-07/msg00159.html
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I hesitate to wish you good luck for the future, since with that policy of
> ignoring other developers there is no future for Axiom.
>
> Have fun with your little Tim-Project.
Tim, I'm leaving, too. I don't want to be part of a project anymore where I
I happened upon the discussions about literate programming on this
mailing list while figuring out why so many people were looking at my
"dsbweb" entry on my blog. I've had some e-mail exchanges with Tim,
who suggested that I might re-post our exchanges to the
list. Rather than re-post without c
The latest changeset introduces two related changes, gclweb and
axiom.sty. Together these changes allow optional syntactic changes to
pamphlets. These changes will completely eliminate the need to weave
files since now a pamphlet file can be a valid latex file. Tangle is
the only remaining comman
ttle Tim-Project.
Ralf
On 07/15/2007 03:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 664
http://svn.sourceforge.net/axiom/?rev=664&view=rev
Author: daly
Date: 2007-07-15 06:10:14 -0700 (Sun, 15 Jul 2007)
Log Message:
---
20070715 tpd src/input/cwmmt.input format ma
19 matches
Mail list logo
