On 9/17/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No ... I'm looking at human-readable e-mail. Why would I track commits?
> I'm not a developer, just a user/tester.
Point taken, sorry about that :-(. I just wanted to point out that the work
is in the commits, even when u don't see n
"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| No ... I'm looking at human-readable e-mail.
Then [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the answer :-)
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Alfredo Portes wrote:
>> Now that I think of it, I'm on the FriCAS and OpenAxiom
>> lists and I haven't seen much activity.
>
> Are you looking at the commits in both projects?
>
No ... I'm looking at human-readable e-mail. Why would I track commits?
I'm not a developer, just a user/tester.
___
Ed,
There is a latest version of GCL also in the zips directory called
gcl-2.6.8pre2 which you can try to build. GCL stayed at the 2.6.8pre
level for a year or more with various fixes so there are two 2.6.8
"snapshots" (gcl-2.6.8pre and gcl-2.6.8pre2)
I suggested 2.6.7 because you said that you h
Greetings! Last I heard, a build was basically at hand with gclcvs
ANSI.
Take care,
"Andrey G. Grozin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> > It turns out the gcl-2.6.7 tarball is there in "zips", so I just edited
> > the Makefile for 2.6.7 and it's
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Camm Maguire wrote:
| Greetings! Please ignore my last post asking for your log -- thanks!
|
| Here is your failure:
|
| GCL (GNU Common Lisp) April 1994 262144 pages
| Building symbol table for
/home/axiom/silver/lsp/gcl-2.6.8pre/unixport/raw_pre_gcl ..
| I'm not an obj
Greetings! Just double checking -- is there a persistent GCL build
failure here? If so, can you please post the full log?
Take care,
"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> root wrote:
> >> That should be easy to test, though -- do the whole build as root and
> >> all the enviro
Greetings! Please ignore my last post asking for your log -- thanks!
Here is your failure:
GCL (GNU Common Lisp) April 1994 262144 pages
Building symbol table for
/home/axiom/silver/lsp/gcl-2.6.8pre/unixport/raw_pre_gcl ..
I'm not an object
Lisp initialization failed.
This has been fixed in
> Now that I think of it, I'm on the FriCAS and OpenAxiom
> lists and I haven't seen much activity.
Are you looking at the commits in both projects?
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ax
"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| And I hardly think that Gentoo Linux on an Athlon64 X2 is a "less common
| architecture". Now that I think of it, I'm on the FriCAS and OpenAxiom
| lists and I haven't seen much activity.
There is quite na bit of activity on [EMAIL PRO
C Y wrote:
> --- Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 09/07/2007 01:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Bill,
>>>
For building Axiom on less common architectures I strongly
recommend the FriCAS or OpenAxiom forks of the Axiom project.
>>> I strongly object to your suggestion
--- Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/07/2007 01:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> >> For building Axiom on less common architectures I strongly
> >> recommend the FriCAS or OpenAxiom forks of the Axiom project.
> >
> > I strongly object to your suggestion that some
On 09/07/2007 01:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
For building Axiom on less common architectures I strongly recommend
the FriCAS or OpenAxiom forks of the Axiom project.
I strongly object to your suggestion that someone who has requested
information, help, or porting assistance on this
13 matches
Mail list logo
