On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, C Y wrote:
| Given Tim's original open source project still retains the name Axiom,
| by default when I refer to Axiom I mean the Axiom open source project.
I have no problem with that. However, it is also important to recognize
that the notion of `original Axiom project' i
OK, I see the confusion. By "original project" I was referring to the
first open source Axiom project, not the original IBM effort.
Given Tim's original open source project still retains the name Axiom,
by default when I refer to Axiom I mean the Axiom open source project.
The naming of "Open Ax
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, C Y wrote:
| --- Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > I believe "heavy use of Lisp" is a recent addition/invention to the
| > so-called 'GOALS of the original Axiom system' -- one that is NOT
| > mentioned in the readme, but that is easily forgotten or pulled out
--- Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe "heavy use of Lisp" is a recent addition/invention to the
> so-called 'GOALS of the original Axiom system' -- one that is NOT
> mentioned in the readme, but that is easily forgotten or pulled out
> of tin air.
Correction then - the origi
C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| --- Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > I don't know, never happened to me yet. But one thing is what I like
| > or don't like and another thing is how to spend my time effectively
| > (i.e. not working on a project, if there is a better alternative).
--- Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know, never happened to me yet. But one thing is what I like
> or don't like and another thing is how to spend my time effectively
> (i.e. not working on a project, if there is a better alternative).
In the case of Axiom (the original project
On 9/18/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> | That said, of
> | course I wouldn't like it, when someone forks a project that I started
> | and worked for a long time.
>
> Even if you
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Ondrej Certik wrote:
| That said, of
| course I wouldn't like it, when someone forks a project that I started
| and worked for a long time.
Even if you gave incentive to create the fork?
-- Gaby
__
> I have no objection to your participation in this mailing list but...
>
> > Then [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the answer :-)
>
> It is inappropriate behavior to advertise or advocate your project
> on this mailing list. You have private email as well as your own
> project mailing list. Please do not do t
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby,
|
| I have no objection to your participation in this mailing list but...
|
| > Then [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the answer :-)
|
| It is inappropriate behavior to advertise or advocate your project
| on this mailing list.
I was answering a specific question a
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
| Tim,
|
| I would have liked that all work on Axiom happens under one roof no matter
| whether there are now (unfortunately) 3 different projects or just one.
Ralf --
Tim has absolutely the right to run his project as he wants -- just
like any one of
Tim,
I would have liked that all work on Axiom happens under one roof no
matter whether there are now (unfortunately) 3 different projects or
just one. We all want a better CAS.
I must say that I come to the conclusion that you rather like 3 separate
projects that do not communicate and lear
Gaby,
I have no objection to your participation in this mailing list but...
> Then [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the answer :-)
It is inappropriate behavior to advertise or advocate your project
on this mailing list. You have private email as well as your own
project mailing list. Please do not do this a
13 matches
Mail list logo
