Francois Maltey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At use, Mupad is almost perfect
> [a $a=0..9] and [10*a+b $a=1..9$b=0..9] and [10*a+b $a=1..9$b=0..9$c=0..9]
> $ is a (right to left)? inner operator.
>
> Of corse parallel iterations must remain as a pretty pure concept of axiom.
So, how do you
There is no deep reason why it is not allowed.
It would be a compatible extension to allow it.
-- Stephen
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:48:25PM +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> >OK. I'd still prefer to keep the language simple. What I would like a lot
> >however is something like
> >
> >for e in
It's maybe impossible to have parenthesis for cross-product,
because they are used for functions,
Parentheses are used for grouping. You know that , (comma) in Aldor is
an operator (with a very low precedence) that forms so called
multivalues? So in
a, b := b, a
you must have parens aroun
OK. I'd still prefer to keep the language simple. What I would like a lot
however is something like
for e in g repeat
(a, b) := e
...
Possible in Aldor
or even
for (a, b) in g repeat
...
given that g returns a Cross.
Not possible in Aldor.
Stephen Watt,
is there a partic
Hello, I have subscribed to the two lists open-axiom and fricas.
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Concerning more general problem: I think that we also need other approaches.
> More preciesly, it would be good to add beter iteration constructs, which
> make iterating over products eas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Arthur, I should note that axserver can construct an improper reply
> having somewhere in the reply. The second should
> not occur (and does not always happen). I have programmed around it)
>
>
>
>
Tim,
Can you give an example of when that occurs?
Arthur
_
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, concat version creates intermediate lists and concatenates them.
> Psychologically double iteration is an atomic operation, so it is
> easier (at least for some folks) to think about.
OK. I'd still prefer to keep the language simple. What I wou
