root wrote:
BTW ... it's possible I'll have my One Laptop Per Child machine before
the end of the year. The shipments have started, and I ordered early
enough that I might get it between Christmas and New Years, or at worst,
in the first week or two of January. So I am looking for a lightweight
> Of course not. I'd call them all axiom.
That's fine. Since you seem to be the primary person interested in
maintaining this bogus ambiguity (so you don't have to change
axiom.el???) there doesn't seem to be a way we can work together on a
converged bug list, converged test suite, or a converged
On 12/20/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Bill Page wrote:
> > On 12/20/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> >> ... There is no confusion on my machines simply because I don't
> >> need either FriCAS or OpenAxiom -- and I haven't installed them --
> >> and I don't intend to.
> >>
> >
> > So are y
>BTW ... it's possible I'll have my One Laptop Per Child machine before
>the end of the year. The shipments have started, and I ordered early
>enough that I might get it between Christmas and New Years, or at worst,
>in the first week or two of January. So I am looking for a lightweight
>CAS. I
>A year or so ago I got a CD from ACM SIGSAM with a bunch of CAS on it,
>including, of course, Axiom. I don't remember what else was on there,
>but I don't think there were any I hadn't heard of from either Debian or
>Gentoo.
If that is the ISSAC CD I probably put that together also. -- Tim
_
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >> Status: fix proposed => closed
> >> >>
> >> >> Strictly speaking, Axiom does not run on Windows
> >> >> so this isn't a bug but a feature request.
> >> >
> >> >Tim, I guess with Axiom you mean your project. If this is indeed the
> >> >case,
> >> >please
Bill Page wrote:
On 12/20/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... There is no confusion on my machines simply because I don't
need either FriCAS or OpenAxiom -- and I haven't installed them --
and I don't intend to.
So are you arguing against Tim's point of view? If there is
root wrote:
Dirk Eddelbuettel called "Quantian"
I worked with him on that. Haven't heard from him in a while.
Have to msg him. Prior to Quantian I was distributing "Rosetta"
CDs which had about 100 CAS-ish systems on them. Along came
Knoppix. I started the Doyen effort but Dirk got the Knoppix
> Dirk Eddelbuettel called "Quantian"
I worked with him on that. Haven't heard from him in a while.
Have to msg him. Prior to Quantian I was distributing "Rosetta"
CDs which had about 100 CAS-ish systems on them. Along came
Knoppix. I started the Doyen effort but Dirk got the Knoppix
thing up and
On 12/20/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... There is no confusion on my machines simply because I don't
> need either FriCAS or OpenAxiom -- and I haven't installed them --
> and I don't intend to.
>
So are you arguing against Tim's point of view? If there is no
confusion
root wrote:
Maintaining this confusion doesn't help the users. Imagine a new CAS
user who decides to download several projects like pari, maxima,
Axiom, Fricas, and OpenAxiom. He decides to install them all and play
with them. The end result will be 3 directories of code, only one of
which can
Martin Rubey wrote:
>> If you'd like to propose a meta-name that is not Axiom
>
> Please propose such a name. I cannot. For me, the meta name is Axiom, and
> there happens to be a sub-project bearing the same name. But that's my
> personal and biased view of things.
What about Scratchpad? I
>> >> Status: fix proposed => closed
>> >>
>> >> Strictly speaking, Axiom does not run on Windows
>> >> so this isn't a bug but a feature request.
>> >
>> >Tim, I guess with Axiom you mean your project. If this is indeed the case,
>> >please do not close bugs, just because they are fixed (in one
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Status: fix proposed
>
>
> I've spent the last 2 hours dragging thru the fricas change list
> trying to reverse-engineer #325 Severe bug in normalize$EFSTRUC
Why don't you just diff efstruc.spad.pamphlet? It seems that it was a
side-effect of fixing #294,
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Status: fix proposed => closed
> >>
> >> Strictly speaking, Axiom does not run on Windows
> >> so this isn't a bug but a feature request.
> >
> >Tim, I guess with Axiom you mean your project. If this is indeed the case,
> >please do not close bugs, just bec
>> Status: fix proposed
I've spent the last 2 hours dragging thru the fricas change list
trying to reverse-engineer #325 Severe bug in normalize$EFSTRUC
I'm giving up on this task until someone posts a patch.
A "fix proposed" status needs to say what the bug was and what the fix
is. The fact t
>> Status: fix proposed => closed
>>
>> Strictly speaking, Axiom does not run on Windows
>> so this isn't a bug but a feature request.
>
>Tim, I guess with Axiom you mean your project. If this is indeed the case,
>please do not close bugs, just because they are fixed (in one sense or the
>other)
Dear Tim, Gaby,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (daly) writes:
> Status: fix proposed => closed
>
> Strictly speaking, Axiom does not run on Windows
> so this isn't a bug but a feature request.
Tim, I guess with Axiom you mean your project. If this is indeed the case,
please do not close bugs, just because
Dear all,
for today I'll stop working on IssueTracker. But I'd like to encourage all
developers of open-axiom and axiom to go through the issues which have status
fix proposed
and check whether they work in their systems, too. These are just 39 bugs,
maybe some are fixed already on all syste
Dear all,
I am working my way through the algebra issues on IssueTracker. For the
moment, I give those bugs that are fixed in FriCAS the status "fix proposed",
with a comment that it is fixed in FriCAS. (Of course, as soon as I encounter
a fixed bug in one of the other versions, I will do the sa
20 matches
Mail list logo
