Re: [Axiom-developer] Rosetta translations

2007-12-28 Thread root
>I think this is a great idea. > >What distribution license does the rosetta tex file have? Modified BSD. I'd like Sage to be in the list so people from other systems can have a clue what form they might type in Sage to get similar results. Tim ___ A

Re: [Axiom-developer] Rosetta translations

2007-12-28 Thread David Joyner
I think this is a great idea. What distribution license does the rosetta tex file have? On 12/28/07, TimDaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At is a document that is > designed > to help users of new systems "translate" simple ideas from their > current

[Axiom-developer] Rosetta translations

2007-12-28 Thread TimDaly
At is a document that is designed to help users of new systems "translate" simple ideas from their current systems. (The source is at ). I do not know Sage well enough to update this information. Is there any

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-28 Thread Martin Rubey
Dear all, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thus, I ask you to comment. I'll wait a week or so (unless I get only > encouraging comments), if I do not get any comments until then, I'll just go > ahead. Meanwhile I'll only reclassify. In a wave of madness I did all the changes, no long

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-28 Thread Martin Rubey
Dear Bill, thanks for your detailed answer. Here a summary of the points where action is still unclear: "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm not so sure what to do with: > > > > Axiom on Windows > > Axiom on Linux > > Axiom on MacOSX > > These also would seem to interact

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-28 Thread Bill Page
On 28 Dec 2007 14:55:43 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote: > Dear Bill, * > > > I am not against revising the status categories so they are more specific > > and better organized but I do think it is essential that we treat all > > versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the NewSynthesis Axiom > > W

[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues

2007-12-28 Thread Martin Rubey
Dear Bill, * > I am not against revising the status categories so they are more specific and > better organized but I do think it is essential that we treat all > versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the NewSynthesis Axiom > Wiki. Doing things the way you suggest does not seem sufficient