[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On at least 2 of these problems Schaums and Axiom seem to disagree
on the results, namely:
14:569 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
14:571 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
as the compute result is not constant but does not seem to have a
simplification that eliminates x.
On at least 2 of these problems Schaums and Axiom seem to disagree
on the results, namely:
14:569 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
14:571 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
as the compute result is not constant but does not seem to have a
simplification that eliminates x.
This needs to be studied
+bb:=x/2+(sinh(a*x)*cosh(a*x))/2
this should be
+bb:=x/2+(sinh(a*x)*cosh(a*x))/2a
I think your Schaums is out of date on this one.
Thanks. It is a typo in my copy of Schaums.
No wonder they disagree.
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
On at least 2 of these problems Schaums and Axiom seem to disagree
on the results, namely:
14:569 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
14:571 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
as the compute result is not constant but does not seem to have a
simplification that eliminates x.
This needs to be studied
Any help on this would really be appreciated.
Is it really a bug in complexNormalize?
--S 5 of 14
aa:=integrate(sinh(a*x)^2*cosh(a*x)^2,x)
--R
--R
--R 33
--Rcosh(a x)sinh(a x) + cosh(a x) sinh(a x) - a x
--R (1)
In 14.661 Schaums claims:
integral acoth(x/a) = x*acoth(x)+a/2*log(x^2-a^2)
Axiom claims
integral acoth(x/a) = x*acoth(x/a)+a/2*log(x^2-a^2)
^^
Is this a Schaums typo?
Tim
___
