Well I spent the night thinking about it and, frankly, I'd
say that Haskell has taken over the niche where Aldor could
have been. Haskell has an interactive mode, a strong compiler,
strong type checking, multi-core support, and a much larger
user population. I don't see that Aldor offers any advant
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Martin Baker wrote:
> On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 21:27:41 Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> [...] if only all this wasted effort could have been spent adding
> Aldor-like features to Axiom.
like per/rep, or import Foreign to OpenAxiom? ;-)
_
Hi Martin,
Better it is free and there is a little chance that some day someone
picks it up) than non-free and unmaintained.
I don't understand the technical issues and I agree that, in most cases,
choice is a good thing.
This is not about choice or fragmentation. Simply look at the error
On Sunday 16 Oct 2011 21:27:41 Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Better it is free and there is a little chance that some day someone
> picks it up) than non-free and unmaintained.
I don't understand the technical issues and I agree that, in most cases,
choice is a good thing.
However, in the case of pan-a
