Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Tim Daly
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Richard Fateman wrote: > > Take up a book on complex analysis and see what problems you have > as you try to encode the statements, or especially the homework > problems. I tried this decades ago with the text I used, > https://www.amazon.com/Functions-Complex-V

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Richard Fateman
Designation of branch cuts is sometimes denoted by natural language. While the end points are specific -- depend of singularities -- the cuts can be moved for convenience, and this is done often to evaluate contour integrals, for example. Take up a book on complex analysis and see what problems y

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Tim Daly
(email failed...retry) William Sit wrote: === >I am still not sure what your immediate goal is. My current understanding (correct me >if I am still wrong) is that you want to translate the left hand side of an identity (like a >formula for an integral) given in latex into Axiom code which the

[Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Tim Daly
(email failed... retry) The referenced paper only looked at the DLMF Airy functions. The results are: "Of the 17 sections in the DLMF sample chapter on Airy functions we can handle the mathematical formulas completely in 6, partially in 5 (without the transformation to MathML), and 6 remain inc