--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
borasky-research.net/m-edward-ed-borasky/
"A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~ Paul Erd?s
Quoting Tim Daly :
As to the Fortran vs C question... I'd be happy with either
but, truth be told, I'd really prefer a lisp
though I can't remember where. There's
probably a Scheme macro to do it, too. ;-)
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
borasky-research.net/m-edward-ed-borasky/
"A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~ Paul Erdos
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
hese paths were partially illuminated in the late
1980s - early 1990s and then abandoned. I think, though, this time
around, there's massive commitment to parallel / concurrent
programming from big players like IBM, Intel, Microsoft and Google.
Oracle too, probably. ;-)
--
M. Edward (Ed
n each node? Surely you don't need a whole
GNU/Linux stack. Perhaps something like the openSUSE JeOS (Just Enough
Operation System)? Which JVM would you be using? Are the parallel /
concurrent hooks in the JVM?
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://borasky-research.net
"I've always regar
; much easier
> to move the system to a parallel base of code. This level of rewrite is on
> the queue
> to think about and study but might take some experimenting.
>
> I have roughly 140 files still to merge into the interpreter volume and it
> takes about a
> week of moving/t
gs
> rather than recreating existing ones.
I have a number of links to "reproducible research" from the R langauge
- it's a big deal in the R community. R has its own literate programming
tool set -- it's patterned after "noweb" but has no external
dependencies.
mediate problem, and then be
discarded -- then you don't care whether it lives or not.
Axiom was clearly designed to live, rather than solve an immediate
problem. But how much code is out there that was designed with a 30-year
horizon?
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
ruby-perspectives.blogspot.com
root wrote:
I had a 2D parser on my desk at IBM. Our Scratchpad group had an
effort to do handwritten input. Maple had one also but I don't know
what the outcome was. I gave a sample at ECCAD in Phila. If you ignore
the handwritten portion of the problem it seems you could create a
parser to hand
root wrote:
J/APL has advantage of forcing you to think about the solution to
a problem in a completely orthogonal way to the usual programming
paradigms. In my experience the "re-expression" of an idea in a
second, very different form dramatically highlights the design
decisions made in the firs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking at the question of documenting Axiom's algorithms.
Beyond the english description I've been pondering the use of J (an
ascii version of APL). J/APL, for those who don't know, is an
executable mathematical programming language. Ken Iverson created it
a
root wrote:
Colleagues,
There is a cross-fertilization that might be very useful for both
the Scientific Linux world and the Sage world.
For those who don't know, Scientific Linux is a linux distribution
that is a "common platform" for scientific users. It was recently
described as:
Sage is an
root wrote:
http://www.catonmat.net/blog/musical-geek-friday-god-wrote-in-lisp-eternal-flame
just for your friday amusement :-)
--- End of forwarded message ---
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nong
It seems that Sage is going to connect with OLPC. If all those kids do their
math using Sage, I think there is no way around Sage anymore. Sage can already
do many many things better than Axiom, I suppose, so we need really good
reasons to continue with Axiom, I think. Maybe I should just r
William Stein wrote:
I'm unconvinced that literate programming is a silver bullet that
solves the problem of making code easier to understand later. I do
strongly
advocate documenting and writing excellent test suites for code.
All code that goes into Sage has every function tested, documented,
William Sit,
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky added you as a friend on The Algebraist Network.
If you don't know M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky is probably a
fan. Consider it a compliment.
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky's profile:
http://algebraist.crowdvine.com/profiles/
Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
On 3/5/08, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
I agree to the general statement: there are many problems
that Axiom can not do -- most beginers will probably give up
concluding "Axiom is too hard to use" and not realize that
what they want to do in not doable using Axi
root wrote:
That's fair. There was no claim that lisp is the right language for
any particular purpose. Ruby is fine and Rails is the fastest path
to a website solution. Lisp is ill suited for that purpose and for
many other purposes.
Well ... I wasn't specifically referring to Rails but rathe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either you "get it" or you don't. There is no half-way with Lisp.
There are no words to explain what it means to "get it" until you do
... and then there is no reason to explain it; you get it.
Well ... many years ago I "got" Lisp. I told myself at the time that if
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 3:43 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The November 2007 release of Axiom is now in Gentoo's Portage repository
for testing. The previous version was the September 2005 tarball! I have
it running on my Athlon64 X2, but I ha
The November 2007 release of Axiom is now in Gentoo's Portage repository
for testing. The previous version was the September 2005 tarball! I have
it running on my Athlon64 X2, but I haven't heard whether it runs on the
other architectures Gentoo supports, especially PowerPC.
_
I just installed Axiom from the SVN repository. When I start it, the
"standard" Hyperdoc comes up. How do I get it to start up the Firefox
version?
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/a
Doug Stewart wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have been concentrating on Axiom's numerical capabilities. The last
>> patch is the beginnings of regression tests against
>> Abramowitz and Stegun (1985) and Zwillinger's CRC Standard (2003).
>> I've also created firefox hyperdoc pages for the ga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The A&S handbook lists polynomial coefficients for approximation of E1,
> the exponential integral. Does anyone know how these coefficients were
> derived? Is it a chebyshev polynomial? I want to dynamically compute
> these coefficients to the required precision.
>
> Tim
root wrote:
BTW ... it's possible I'll have my One Laptop Per Child machine before
the end of the year. The shipments have started, and I ordered early
enough that I might get it between Christmas and New Years, or at worst,
in the first week or two of January. So I am looking for a lightweight
Bill Page wrote:
On 12/20/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... There is no confusion on my machines simply because I don't
need either FriCAS or OpenAxiom -- and I haven't installed them --
and I don't intend to.
So are you arguing against Tim'
root wrote:
Dirk Eddelbuettel called "Quantian"
I worked with him on that. Haven't heard from him in a while.
Have to msg him. Prior to Quantian I was distributing "Rosetta"
CDs which had about 100 CAS-ish systems on them. Along came
Knoppix. I started the Doyen effort but Dirk got the Knoppix
root wrote:
Maintaining this confusion doesn't help the users. Imagine a new CAS
user who decides to download several projects like pari, maxima,
Axiom, Fricas, and OpenAxiom. He decides to install them all and play
with them. The end result will be 3 directories of code, only one of
which can
C Y wrote:
OK, it looks like inserting -lXpm into a couple make files did it - I'm
not sure yet however where the "correct" place in the Gentoo makefiles
to add that section is.
CY
Be a better friend, n
C Y wrote:
Hi all. I just tried building the silver tree on Gentoo,and ran into
the following:
32 making
/home/cyapp/mathtoplevel/axiomtoplevel/silver-compile/obj/gentoo/graph
/view2d/write2d.o from
/home/cyapp/mathtoplevel/axiomtoplevel/silver-compile/int
/graph/view2d/write2d.c
34 linking
/ho
root wrote:
The main plus of this packaging for sage is that it builds from
source quickly (in a few minutes) using precompiled clisp files.
Well, on my 2Ghz machine with 2 Gig of memory running VMWare and
using the sage vmware image (but upgrading the VM to have 1G memory)
I started the packag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sage hit slashdot (and slashdot it back, I'm sure).
One anonymous coward posted the following quote which I find
worth preserving. The Crystal idea is a bit beyond what he's
thinking but I think he's on the right track.
I am a mathematician and shelling out a few hundre
Michel Lavaud wrote:
If the plane I'm flying is built based on simulations with commercial
mathematical software tools, I surely want them to be the best.
If the plane I'm flying is built based on simulations with commercial
mathematical software tools, whose accuracy is guaranteed in the u
root wrote:
The NSF, INRIA, and others cover it.
These are the same people who won't fund Axiom because "it competes
with commercial software". Which shows that they don't understand
that Axiom is NOT trying to compete; and that funding competition
to commercial software implies funding BOTH side
William Stein wrote:
Whether or not a system can compete is determined by what actual real
people really want and can afford when teaching or doing research.
It's not at all clear to me that actual research mathematicians, teachers
and engineers want what you're describing above more than the
o
Arthur Ralfs wrote:
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Well ... if you mean "*Red Hat* Linux has won a significant market
share in servers", I agree. However, I don't think as a user that
either Firefox or OpenOffice are of sufficient quality or maturity to
be used on a Windows deskt
William Stein wrote:
Well I'm trying to directly compete with heavily financed commercial
systems. I think you are wrong that one cannot win. Linux, Firefox,
OpenOffice, etc., are all examples of direct competition with heavily
financed commercial systems, where they have all won, at least
wher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summary: November 2007 release
All of the golden sources are up to date.
savannah.nongnu.org/projects/axiom CVS
sourceforge.net/projects/axiom CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ARCH (axiom--main--1--patch-54)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GIT
ADD NEW CREDITS
New patches were post
William Stein wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 12:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sixth, computational mathematics, which currently rests on closed
source commercial efforts, will eventually suffer from a massive
"black hole" once the current software dies. Suppose Wolfram Research
and Maplesoft go out
root wrote:
Excellent. I'll download the latest TeXmacs and try it. -- Tim
OK ... here's some sample output. I started up TeXmacs, went into the
menu Edit -> Preferences -> Converters -> TeXmacs > Html -> Use MathML.
Then I did an Insert -> Session -> Axiom. That starts up Axiom in the
backgr
root wrote:
On another subject...
I've long had the notion that we need a Computer Algebra Test Suite
(CATS) that lays out the mathematics and then shows the same
mathematics done by a range of computer algebra systems.
I have a test suite of ODEs that I've put together than consists of a
coupl
root wrote:
> (copied to list)
>
> Actually beyond porting hyperdoc to windows I've been looking at
> wxAxiom (based on wxMaxima) and a browser-based Hyperdoc.
>
> At the moment, due to the great work by Arthur Ralfs, I'm making
> progress on the browser-based version. I now have some of the
> h
Alfredo Portes wrote:
>> Now that I think of it, I'm on the FriCAS and OpenAxiom
>> lists and I haven't seen much activity.
>
> Are you looking at the commits in both projects?
>
No ... I'm looking at human-readable e-mail. Why would I track commits?
I'm not a developer, just a user/tester.
___
C Y wrote:
> --- Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 09/07/2007 01:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Bill,
>>>
For building Axiom on less common architectures I strongly
recommend the FriCAS or OpenAxiom forks of the Axiom project.
>>> I strongly object to your suggestion
root wrote:
> try
> user> export SHVAR=i/am/set
> user> echo $SHVAR
> user> sudo echo $SHVAR
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ export SHVAR=i/am/set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo $SHVAR
i/am/set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo echo $SHVAR
i/am/set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $
_
root wrote:
>> That should be easy to test, though -- do the whole build as root and
>> all the environment variables will be set all the way through. It won't
>> take me long to check it -- it's less than an hour on an Athlon64 X2
>> 5200+ :).
>
> envy :-) send the system to me and i'll test it h
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> root wrote:
>> root wrote:
>>>>> Ah -- I'll try that. Meanwhile, the Axiom build with gcl-2.6.7 completed
>>>>> fine on the AMD64, so I guess 2.6.8pre2 is broken. One minor hitch:
>>>>> apparent
root wrote:
> root wrote:
Ah -- I'll try that. Meanwhile, the Axiom build with gcl-2.6.7 completed
fine on the AMD64, so I guess 2.6.8pre2 is broken. One minor hitch:
apparently when you do a "make install", it's not doing a "mkdir -p":
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/axiom/silver
root wrote:
>> Ah -- I'll try that. Meanwhile, the Axiom build with gcl-2.6.7 completed
>> fine on the AMD64, so I guess 2.6.8pre2 is broken. One minor hitch:
>> apparently when you do a "make install", it's not doing a "mkdir -p":
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/axiom/silver $ sudo make install
>> 7
root wrote:
>
> Axiom cannot use the installed lisp as it is currently configured.
> If you wish you could copy the obj/linux/bin/lisp to your system
> location and use it as your GCL image. The only change is that it
> links some routines used for communications to sman, which should
> be transp
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> root wrote:
>> Ed,
>>
>> I've forwarded your email to Camm Maguire, the GCL maintainer.
>>
>> It appears to be failing during GCL build. If you are using the
>> Axiom distribution there is a variable in the top lev
that version of GCL from the zips archive.
>
> Tim
>
> --- Start of forwarded message -------
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:30:24 -0700
> From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070905)
> To: axiom-devel
Is there some reason the GCL in Axiom shouldn't build on a 64-bit Linux
system (gcc 4.2.0)? I've got three systems. Two are 32-bit and one is
64-bit. Both gold and silver build fine on the 32-bit ones, but both
crash building GCL on the 64-bit system. Here's a trace ("silver", if it
matters):
ar:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cliff,
>
> We're not in the advertising business. We're doing long term science.
Maybe so, but a little word of mouth can't hurt. Consider the Ubuntu
phenomenon. ;)
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd prefer the binary numbering scheme to reflect the date
> of the gold version, so the Gold Sept 2007 version would be
>axiom-7.9.0.tgz
> (that is, Sept, 2007 == 7.9). This will be unique and clear.
Well ... OK ... but since we are looking for something to last the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Apparently I forgot to do an 'svn add' for the Martin's files.
> The test build completes successfully here and runs fine.
> The problem you had should be fixed.
>
> Tim
>
Sounds like a plan ... I just started the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The file newton.spad contains the NEWTON domain which also exists
> in duplicate form in fffg.spad. The newton.spad file is removed
> by this patch.
>
> Tim
I just synced up with the Silver SVN repository last night ... her
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> When I began to use Axiom closing parenthesis looked pointless and
> obscure to me. Now I can see reasons for using closing parenthesis
> and I think it is both obscure and ingenious. It is ingenious
> largely because of obscu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Axiom has a goal of a new, non-archaic user interface called Crystal.
> I've spent a fair amount of time researching the subject and creating
> little test case setups to experiment with ideas. The Crystal effort
> has been d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Page wrote:
> One of the defining characteristics of GPL is that *if* you
> incorporate *any* source code from some other package that is licensed
> under GPL into some new product - _whatever the license of the
> original code_ - *then* the entir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Page wrote:
> For a better user interface experience I would recommend using Axiom
> within Sage. Sage provides a browser-based notebook interface that
> should be familiar to most students these days. And for cryptography I
> think Sage's common
C Y wrote:
>> Incidentally, I "do" have Dick Pountain's "Object-Oriented Forth",
>> which is probably as good a reference for implementing other
>> languages on a Forth base as you're likely to find anywhere. If
>> you're in the mood to re-invent a wheel or two, I'd recommend
>> starting there.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ed,
>
>> (Silver Edition, downloaded with "git" last night, successfully
>> compiled, but crashed trying to do a plot):
>
> I'm concerned about this crash. Can you send me the exact line you
> typed that caused the error?
>
> I run a test suite on hyperdoc and graphic
First of all, I'm "just a user" -- a working programmer/applied
mathematician (45 years and counting.) I've been doing this since
*before* ScratchPad. Perhaps some of you have heard of FORMAC? I was
working at IBM in Poughkeepsie, NY, when Jean Sammet and her colleagues
released it! And I was there
C Y wrote:
> --- "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I may have that buried somewhere -- at one point I acquired just
>> about everything I could on Forth, and I never threw it away. What
>> was the title/author/date? A couple of oth
Bill Page wrote:
> You can find (almost) anything on the Web
[snip]
Yes you can ... so, under the heading of "Nostalgia Ain't What It Used
To Be",
http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/aut/
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://l
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some changes to Silver down in pipeline (some of them were
> brought here and discussed on the list). However, before doing that,
> I would like to establish as a policy that we use -- from now on --
> the `standard' ChangeLog format to record history of
Bill Page wrote:
> The first Lisp I ever used was written in Fortran and ran on a PDP 11. :-)
The assembly language of the original PDP 11 (before all the ugly
extensions, etc., got tacked onto it) was so simple, logical, rational
and elegant that I can't imagine a Lisp interpreter for it written i
Bill Page wrote:
> On 8/10/07, C Y wrote:
>> Not at $4 any more. I didn't notice it in time. Arrrgh.
>>
>
> :-) I think I got the last one. When I went to amazon.ca it said: 1
> new copy for $3.99 and about 10 used copies for about $70. I was
> afraid the my order would be cancelled by the time I
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | Writing Boot to generate Lisp is like writing Fortran to generate Aldor.
> | If you are a Fortran programmer you won't see why that's a problem.
> | If you are an Aldor programmer you can't imagine why that isn't a problem.
> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Derive
>
> Derive is a fantastic program and often outperformed everything else.
> It is historically interesting, in the "Newton's Notebooks" sense.
>
> I have spent the last few months trying to convince TI to either
> release the original derive lisp code (whic
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Now, it you know Spad, them I claim you know Boot.
Uh huh ... and if I know Lisp 1.5, I know Common Lisp and Scheme, right?
If I know Algol 60, I know CPL, BCPL, B and C? In some sense, yes, I do.
I'm simply saying that it's a tremendous burden to need to deal with
more
C Y wrote:
>> -- I much prefer, as you seem to, higher-level abstractions in
>> programming languages. You may need a hierarchy of languages to get
>> there, but do you need it forever?
>
> The bootstrap problem occurs when languages become divorced from their
> original implementations in another
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> But does it really need so many sub-languages?
>
> Well, that's a religious question.
>
> Some on the wailing list feel that Meta and Boot should be recovered,
> made strongly typed, and closer to the algebra language. On the plus
> side it will be claimed that these
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> the one that I think has the strongest legs is Erlang
>
> Funny you should mention that as I'm half way thru the new Erlang book.
> This model, if not the language itself, is a perfect vehicle for an
> implementation of provisos (much discussed on this list). Using clos
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> In fact that is open to debate, by reality check. The only "good"
> Common Lisp compiler I know freely available is SBCL, and we don't
> support it right now. And Common Lisp actually gives you very little
> support to write useful programs.
Well ... SBCL is a re-write
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 8/9/07, Tim Daly wrote:
> | >
> | > In the IBM/NAG days you needed a running Axiom to build Axiom.
> | >
> |
> | I believe that is one of the things that allowed Axiom to become so
> | advanced so quickly (relatively speak
root wrote:
> Yet another parallel use would be creating direction field
> images for differential equations. Each machine could be
> given a particular isocline to compute over a given domain
> and the final combined results into solution curves.
>
>> Oh, and I forgot to mention another significa
root wrote:
> I suppose we could work out a scheduled time for "group meetings".
> I'm usually online all day and late into the night but a scheduled
> time would make it reasonable. I have not been monitoring the IRC
> channel because the beta version of Gaim cannot handle the IRC helper
> plugin.
C Y wrote:
> Since the Axiom developers are in such remote geographic locations, I
> was wondering if there was/is any interest in having an online meeting
> in the axiom IRC channel. I have seen this done occasionally for other
> projects and it would be less expensive for those of us who can't
>
C Y wrote:
> --- Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There is at least one better tool than noweb: Leo
>>
>> http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html
>>
>> I believe that many of the design features of Leo would be beneficial
>> to the Axiom project.
>
> I took one run at Leo and boun
root wrote:
>> 1. As far as I know, GCL and CLISP are the only open source Lisps that
>> run on Windows. CMUCL for sure doesn't and SBCL may not either. CMUCL
>> probably never will, but SBCL has a good chance.
>>
>
> SBCL runs on Windows.
>
That's good to hear! Native or CygWin?
>
>>
C Y wrote:
I tried the binary and found it didn't work on Gentoo, so it was back
to building from source. I got most of the way there with a gold
branch cvs checkout (I think it's fairly recent) and started up the
aldor part of the build. This was the error:
mkdir -p
/home/user/mathtoplevel/ax
Bill Page wrote:
On August 12, 2006 8:56 PM Gaby wrote:
...
There are still some patches against GCL that Tim developed.
Ideally, I think we should not be in the business of patching
GCL. Camm has been collaborating with us very effectively; we
should communicate those issues with him and see h
).
Sorting entriesdone (12024 comparisons).
Generating output file bookvol1.ind.done (875 lines written, 0
warnings).
Output written in bookvol1.ind.
Transcript written in bookvol1.ilg.
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Thanks!! Two enters did it.
>
>
>
> Gabriel
Thanks!! Two enters did it.
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | The SVN should never contain bad latex.
>
> It has been so since the initial se up...
> I'll look ino it later.
>
> -- Gaby
>
>
--
M. Edward
0:12 bookvol5.dvi
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Jun 22 20:11 msgs
Do I just need to be patient, or is this broken??
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
> For my curiosity: is it expected that the .o coming from compiling a
>> .lsp actually is NOT a "usual" .o file?
>>
>>
>
> No, usually the .data file is appended to the .o output by gcc, but
> here the latter is empty.
>
> Take care,
>
>
&g
]
>>
>
> So why don't you package Axiom for SuSE ?
>
> Best wishes,
> d.
>
>
> ___
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
>
>
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapaci
s) to C++; among other things I digested Icon's
> implementation. That was not too long ago.
>
> -- Gaby
>
>
> ___
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
>
>
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
"just like I used
to do in Derive 5". :) The engine is still Maxima, with all its warts
and limitations, but the user interface instantly made sense to me.
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
t are not yet solved.
>
> I think that TeXmacs is the way to go, but TeXmacs was a bit slow for
> my taste and the wysiwyg thing somehow contradicts TeX. One should
> concentrate on the contents not on its appearance. But of course,
> having CAS command lines integrated into the text is nice.
time that is needed by noweb.
>
> If someone wants to make noweb faster, fine, but please keep ALL its
> functionalities AND its flexibility. Yes, noweb offers a feature to
> hyperlink names in code chunks. (See it in work in ALLPROSE.)
>
> Ralf
>
>
> On 05/22/20
cademic interchange to require running code much as standard
> mathematics requires a proof. i want a literate journal that referees
> literate computational mathematics papers. (for academics, programs
> are a loss at the moment because they are not considered for tenure
amp; Noble, Borders, etc. shortly.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
_
__
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
imes.
I also do not really know which way to go, embed Axiom in R or embed R in
Axiom...
Do you have ideas?
Martin
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
--
Cats are
om
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mai
Another resource:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/8397
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
e objects,
slots, etc. One of these days I suppose I should learn how macros work.
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
ical Common Lisp" has an answer.
<http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/>
If not, i'm sure comp.lang.lisp will be helpful.
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
