Axiom Developers;
The Axiom Foundation was established approximately 1 year ago to
promote the development and maintenance of the open source version
of Axiom through the dispersement of donations to support Axiom-
related projects and through the Award Of Bounties.
Foundation Membership
The
"Tim Daly Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 00:24 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Must people don't run Apache on their desktop configurations.
>
> What? I don't know these most people, but most of the people
> I know run Apache.
Oh, that's good. I thought that
On Monday, November 14, 2005 8:45 AM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> > Subject: lisp webserver
> > From: "Tim Daly Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:29:43 +0100
> >
> > If you want to bolt Lisp onto a webserver, the sweet spot
> >
In
http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/SandBoxCategoryOfGraphs
I am trying to define the category of graphs in Aldor.
When I try to use this category in the definition of the
domain of FiniteGraphs I get an unexpected error:
There are no suitable meanings for the operator `GraphCat
On September 2, 2005 10:49 AM Peter Broadbery wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 22:11 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Also, I have javac 1.5.0_04. Can I assume you don't actually
> > > REQUIRE javac 1.5.0_03?
> >
> > Yes. In fact I am not 100% sure that it is Sun's JDK 1.5.x that
> > is requ
On September 2, 2005 11:09 AM Camm Maguire wrote:
>
> Greetings! There are just a few probe-file -> truename patches
> required. Should I apply these to the April 2005 sources and
> make a Debian release? Or is there a later official savannah
> version coming?
>
There are some patches emminen
> Also, I have javac 1.5.0_04. Can I assume you don't actually REQUIRE
> javac 1.5.0_03?
Yes. In fact I am not 100% sure that it is Sun's JDK 1.5.x that is
required but I have verified that it works. Peter never said exactly
what java compiler he is using.
It would be nice if one could use the GN
Tim wrote:
>
> As a practical matter we can't expect axiom users to upgrade
> both make and java just to build Axiom. I'm following the
> directions you put on the AldorForAxiom page just to verify
> that I understand the process.
Great.
>
> I need to rebuild the machinery so it works with any
