Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" and bug

2007-08-13 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
On 08/13/2007 05:18 PM, William Sit wrote: Ralf Hemmecke wrote: Let's compile and run the program below. woodpecker:~/scratch>aldor -laldor -grun aaa.as has with {foo: ()->()} = T has with {bar: ()->()} = T has with {rhx: ()->()} = T has with {foo: ()->()} = T has with {bar: ()->()} = T has wi

Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" and bug

2007-08-13 Thread William Sit
Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > Let's compile and run the program below. > > woodpecker:~/scratch>aldor -laldor -grun aaa.as > has with {foo: ()->()} = T > has with {bar: ()->()} = T > has with {rhx: ()->()} = T > has with {foo: ()->()} = T > has with {bar: ()->()} = T > has with {rhx: ()->()} = T > MDom h

[Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" and bug

2007-08-13 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
I'm saying that the parameter S of the default package Monad& -- generated for the default implementation of the category Monad -- is of the named category Monad. Sorry, I am too lazy to go back where all began. But let me quote that piece of code here. Monad(): Category == SetCategory with