Waldek Hebisch writes:
[...]
| Also, I think it would be reasonable to change name to
| FriCAS Wiki and change logo (currently all pages show
| Axiom logo).
this goes back to a question I asked some time ago. Glad to see it has
found a more definitive answer.
-- Gaby
Eugene Surowitz writes:
[...]
| The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
| source files reveals numerous references to 'axiom' or 'Axiom'.
| FriCAS appears to use boot code -- I assume, without having got
| around to inspecting it in more detail, that it too may contain
|
Feel free to delete the CAISS thank-you information.
They get thanked on the Axiom home page.
I have no opinion about changing anything on the Wiki provided
that any use of "Axiom" actually refers to the Axiom project.
I see you've already taken steps to make it clear what system
is used. Thank y
>> I think Tim would already be happy, if we modify the
>>
>> axiom
>>
>> that appears on every outputbox of
>>
>> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxObserverAsIdempotent2
>> (and every such box on such generated output) into "fricas".
>>
>> I don't care if fricas-devel get's more bug re
Ralf,
>We are in the unfortunate situation of having 3 systems that are
>terribly similar but not equal. Would be nice if we converged, but I
>don't see this to happen in the near future. So it's only fair if people
>are made aware of the differences of the systems.
You'll notice that I have made
On 23 April 2013 15:22, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> Bill Page wrote:
>>
>> The frontpage of the website
>>
>> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org
>>
>> and more specifically the following linked page
>>
>> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/AboutAxiom
>>
>> Refers to all three "Axiom-related" projects
Bill Page wrote:
>
> The frontpage of the website
>
> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org
>
> and more specifically the following linked page
>
> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/AboutAxiom
>
> Refers to all three "Axiom-related" projects (plus Reduce, Maxima,
> Sage although I think Waldek h
>
> I think Tim would already be happy, if we modify the
>
> axiom
>
> that appears on every outputbox of
>
> http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxObserverAsIdempotent2
> (and every such box on such generated output) into "fricas".
>
> I don't care if fricas-devel get's more bug reports i
One Wiki with a clear indication which variant
is being exercised and auto-direction to the
appropriate list for comments and bug reports.
Cheers, Gene
On 4/23/2013 12:07 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Eugene Surowitz wrote:
Personally, I would very much prefer a single wiki.
I believe that users
I think Tim would already be happy, if we modify the
axiom
that appears on every outputbox of
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxObserverAsIdempotent2
(and every such box on such generated output) into "fricas".
I don't care if fricas-devel get's more bug reports in this way.
That would
Eugene Surowitz wrote:
>
> Personally, I would very much prefer a single wiki.
>
> I believe that users would have great difficulty in distinguishing
> the various forks in a systematic way; they may not have
> been the one to set up which ever variation was installed with
> their working group.
Eugene Surowitz wrote:
>
> The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
> source files reveals numerous references to 'axiom' or 'Axiom'.
> FriCAS appears to use boot code -- I assume, without having got
> around to inspecting it in more detail, that it too may contain
> many s
I have known about 'sed' for a long time;
but have had enough experience with global
change mechanisms to avoid them like the plague.
Cheers, Gene
On 4/22/2013 1:42 PM, u1204 wrote:
Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include OpenAx
>I am sorry, but changing variable names inside source code because of
>a project fork seems incorrect to me. I think it would be both wrong
>and even more confusing if FriCAS and OpenAxiom tried to give the
>impression that they had no relation to each other and no relation at
>all to the origina
I am sorry, but changing variable names inside source code because of
a project fork seems incorrect to me. I think it would be both wrong
and even more confusing if FriCAS and OpenAxiom tried to give the
impression that they had no relation to each other and no relation at
all to the original Axi
On 22 April 2013 13:42, u1204 wrote:
>> Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
>> to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include OpenAxiom.
>>
>> The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
>> source files reveals numerous references to 'axiom' or 'Axiom'.
> Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
> to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include OpenAxiom.
>
> The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
> source files reveals numerous references to 'axiom' or 'Axiom'.
> FriCAS appears to use boot code -- I as
Already understood and I had already mirrored my comments
to the FriCAS-devel list; just forgot to include OpenAxiom.
The issue is deeper though: An inspection of only the src/interp
source files reveals numerous references to 'axiom' or 'Axiom'.
FriCAS appears to use boot code -- I assume, witho
Eugene,
The issue has nothing to do with the wiki. I don't care if the wiki
uses Axiom. Axiom is open source software and can be used by anyone.
The issue is using the Axiom name to label things that are not Axiom.
In this instance, the web page
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxOb
The frontpage of the website
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org
and more specifically the following linked page
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/AboutAxiom
Refers to all three "Axiom-related" projects (plus Reduce, Maxima,
Sage although I think Waldek has already disabled support for these
"n
Personally, I would very much prefer a single wiki.
I believe that users would have great difficulty in distinguishing
the various forks in a systematic way; they may not have
been the one to set up which ever variation was installed with
their working group.
Gene
On 4/21/2013 11:00 PM, Bill Pa
21 matches
Mail list logo
