>> On at least 2 of these problems Schaums and Axiom seem to disagree
>> on the results, namely:
>> 14:569 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
>> 14:571 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
>> as the compute result is not constant but does not seem to have a
>> simplification that eliminates x.
>> This needs
>
>+bb:=x/2+(sinh(a*x)*cosh(a*x))/2
>
>this should be
>
>+bb:=x/2+(sinh(a*x)*cosh(a*x))/2a
>
>I think your Schaums is out of date on this one.
Thanks. It is a typo in my copy of Schaums.
No wonder they disagree.
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
> On at least 2 of these problems Schaums and Axiom seem to disagree
> on the results, namely:
> 14:569 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
> 14:571 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
> as the compute result is not constant but does not seem to have a
> simplification that eliminates x.
> This needs to be s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On at least 2 of these problems Schaums and Axiom seem to disagree
on the results, namely:
14:569 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
14:571 SCHAUMS AND AXIOM DISAGREE?
as the compute result is not constant but does not seem to have a
simplification that eliminates x.
This
