Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Greetings, and thanks for the report! Typeo should be gone now in
| both branches.
Great! I'll update build-improvements later, assuming I still have
connectivity.
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Greetings, and thanks for the report! Typeo should be gone now in
both branches.
Just wanted to note that the only way you can guarantee that you don't
get a copy out of object_to_string is to write a null character at the
end of the lisp string body yourself, as there is extra room only in
speci
> > > Since gcl-2.6.8pre2 seem to be latest gcl version Camm can probably
> > > just do nothing (just remember so that problem is not re-introduced
> > > later).
> >
> > No, GCL included in build-improvements is more recent than
> > gcl-2.6.8pre2. The code that you describe is in gcl-2.6.8pre just
Vanuxem Grégory wrote:
> Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 ? 17:47 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
> > Since gcl-2.6.8pre2 seem to be latest gcl version Camm can probably
> > just do nothing (just remember so that problem is not re-introduced
> > later).
>
> No, GCL included in build-improvements is more
Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 à 17:47 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
> > Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 ? 03:09 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
> > > Investigating further I have noticed that gcl-2.6.8pre2 in silver is
> > > different then gcl-2.6.8pre in build improvements. In particular
> > > the funct
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >
| > | > Exactly, a typo (& instead of %), no ? I think Camm read this
| > | > mailing list but writing directly to him would be a good idea.
| > | >
| > |
| > | I agree. The following line in the diff output below
| > |
| > | + if (x->st.st_dim == leng
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I don't know when gcl-2.6.8pre2 was made.
|
| from CHANGELOG in Gold:
|
| 20060821 tpd lsp/Makefile add gcl-2.6.8pre2
Aha; so the faulty change in gcl-2.6.8pre is much more recent.
Thanks!
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-deve
> | >
> | > Exactly, a typo (& instead of %), no ? I think Camm read this
> | > mailing list but writing directly to him would be a good idea.
> | >
> |
> | I agree. The following line in the diff output below
> |
> | + if (x->st.st_dim == leng && leng & sizeof(object)
> |
> | should actually
> I don't know when gcl-2.6.8pre2 was made.
from CHANGELOG in Gold:
20060821 tpd lsp/Makefile add gcl-2.6.8pre2
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On October 13, 2006 8:55 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >
| > | > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > | > Waldek Hebi
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 ? 03:09 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
| > > Investigating further I have noticed that gcl-2.6.8pre2 in silver is
| > > different then gcl-2.6.8pre in build improvements. In particular
| > > the function object_to_string i
On October 13, 2006 8:55 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | >
> | > | > | Play
> Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 ? 03:09 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
> > Investigating further I have noticed that gcl-2.6.8pre2 in silver is
> > different then gcl-2.6.8pre in build improvements. In particular
> > the function object_to_string in gcl-2.6.8pre2/o/cmpaux.c is like
> > gcl-2.6.7 whi
Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 à 03:09 +0200, Waldek Hebisch a écrit :
[...]
> >
> > The output of ? "NAG link" and then on "Browser pages for individual
> > routines" ? is
> >
> > There is no constructor matching pattern "Nag*"
> >
>
> This I consider as "normal" output. For me the browser just
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 ? 00:32 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
> > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | >
> > | > | Playing with build-improvem
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >
| > | > | Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is
broken:
| >
Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 à 02:36 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
> Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 à 00:32 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
> | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > | > Waldek Hebis
Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 à 00:32 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
| > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | >
| > | > | Playing with build-improvements
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is broken:
> | >
> | > Is that reproducible with silver?
> | >
> |
> |
Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 à 00:32 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is broken:
> | >
> | > Is tha
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is broken:
| >
| > Is that reproducible with silver?
| >
|
| Probably no: when I tried build-improvements w
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is broken:
>
> Is that reproducible with silver?
>
Probably no: when I tried build-improvements with gcl-2.6.7 the problem
went away.
--
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is broken:
Is that reproducible with silver?
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
Playing with build-improvements I have noticed that hypertex is broken:
clicking on "NAG link" and then on "Browser pages for individual routines"
freezes hypertex windows and gives the following error message at
Axiom command line:
>> System error:
Unexpected end of #.
I have tracked down
24 matches
Mail list logo
