On 08/12/16 18:03, Tim Daly wrote:
So the real question might be "Can I formulate my physics in
matrix and tensors and shift between them". Which leads to the
question "Can I easily convert between matrices and tensors?"
From what I've seen so far this should be possible, provided it is
implement
I've given no thought to unifying these three areas or
layering them in any obvious way. I'd be interested in any
thoughts you have on the subject.
For quantum physics I'm working my way through
Nielsen "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" and
Mermin "Quantum Computer Science"
I want to b
Tim,
You recently mentioned Clifford Algebra a couple of times so I thought I
would mention an idea that I had on the subject. The idea is still too
vague and hand-wavy to turn into code but I would be interested to know
if anyone thinks its viable?
The idea is to implement a 3-layer archite
Martin Baker wrote:
Bertfried,
In addition to the limitations of the current Clifford algebra implementation,
that you explained, there also seem (to my untrained eye) to be performance
issues. Also I wanted to get a feel for the general Axiom design methodology
by picking a specific issue.
Bertfried,
In addition to the limitations of the current Clifford algebra implementation,
that you explained, there also seem (to my untrained eye) to be performance
issues. Also I wanted to get a feel for the general Axiom design methodology
by picking a specific issue.
The current implementa
