Quoting C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Vladimir Bondarenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CY> I don't think this is the case
I know this; to an extent, it was my provocative overstatement. I'd
rather like to hear some comments from AXIOM developers.
CY> rather, we feel that Axiom has the long t
--- Vladimir Bondarenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am shocked to observe that it looks like AXIOM developers have
> an idea that "there are not so many defects in AXIOM".
I don't think this is the case - rather, we feel that Axiom has the
long term potential to provide a robust environment on
Frankly, a big problem I see, there is not a single practical
QA engineer within AXIOM folks.
If you know a QA engineer who wants to contribute to Axiom's QA send him
to us. Our sources live in the open. Everyone is free to contribute.
If you qualify as a QA engineer, contribute yourself. Jus
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
| From a user's perspective, I believe that MuPAD is currently the best CAS
| around.
Yes, that is why I hesitated long between MuPAD an Axiom. I was a little
unhappy with MuPAD's choice og going non-"free" for academic purposes -- but I
believe I underst
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Alasdair McAndrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As far as I know, nobody has tried to compare CAS's since Michael Wester's
| attempts in the 1990's.
Not that I know of. I believe Wester's work date back from late
1990s. Everywhere else in comput
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Alasdair McAndrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | As far as I know, nobody has tried to compare CAS's since Michael Wester's
> | attempts in the 1990's.
>
> Not that I know of. I believe Wester's work date back from late
> 1990s. Everywhere e
"Alasdair McAndrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As far as I know, nobody has tried to compare CAS's since Michael Wester's
| attempts in the 1990's.
Not that I know of. I believe Wester's work date back from late
1990s. Everywhere else in computer science, that would be an
eternity, but not
As far as I know, nobody has tried to compare CAS's since Michael Wester's
attempts in the 1990's. And even then, his final test, which had over 500
problems purporting to be from "all areas of mathematics" was not in any way
comprehensive: no topology, no abstract algebra, not much logic, nothin
