Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-10-05 Thread Tim Daly
Axiom calls COQ (for Spad code) and ACL2 (for Lisp code) at build time in order to run proofs. It is hard enough trying to construct proofs by hand despite the notion that Spad is "nearly mathematical". Implementation details matter a lot. We do, however, have the types already available. Even with

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-10-05 Thread James Davenport
Sorry – I’ve not been much involved: other projects. But I just saw this – haven’t looked in any detail yet. DeepAlgebra - an outline of a program Authors: Przemyslaw Chojecki Categories: cs.AI math.AG Comments: 6 pages, https://przchojecki.github.io/deepalgebra/ \\ We outline a program in

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-09-01 Thread Tim Daly
The weaver program can now process a latex document. The end result is a tree structure of the same document. There is still more to do, of course. Much more. It is clear that the semantics of the markup tags are all in the weaver program. This is obvious in hindsight since the markup needs to be

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Tim Daly
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Richard Fateman wrote: > > Take up a book on complex analysis and see what problems you have > as you try to encode the statements, or especially the homework > problems. I tried this decades ago with the text I used, > https://www.amazon.com/Functions-Complex-V

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Richard Fateman
Designation of branch cuts is sometimes denoted by natural language. While the end points are specific -- depend of singularities -- the cuts can be moved for convenience, and this is done often to evaluate contour integrals, for example. Take up a book on complex analysis and see what problems y

Re: [Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Tim Daly
(email failed...retry) William Sit wrote: === >I am still not sure what your immediate goal is. My current understanding (correct me >if I am still wrong) is that you want to translate the left hand side of an identity (like a >formula for an integral) given in latex into Axiom code which the

[Axiom-developer] Design of Semantic Latex

2016-08-27 Thread Tim Daly
(email failed... retry) The referenced paper only looked at the DLMF Airy functions. The results are: "Of the 17 sections in the DLMF sample chapter on Airy functions we can handle the mathematical formulas completely in 6, partially in 5 (without the transformation to MathML), and 6 remain inc