> > > Maybe I should have been a bit more precise. I actually already knew
> > > what )abbrev is for. I just forgot the syntax.
> > >
> > > As you see the first message tells me:
> > >
> > >Issue )abbrev? for more information.
> > >
> > > And if I do that I get a not so helpful message. Tha
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maybe I should have been a bit more precise. I actually already knew
> > what )abbrev is for. I just forgot the syntax.
> >
> > As you see the first message tells me:
> >
> >Issue )abbrev? for more information.
> >
> > And if I do that I get a not so he
Hi Tim,
On 02/15/2006 03:39 PM, root wrote:
Maybe I should have been a bit more precise. I actually already knew
what )abbrev is for. I just forgot the syntax.
As you see the first message tells me:
Issue )abbrev? for more information.
And if I do that I get a not so helpful message. That
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I agree that the limitation on the length of the abbreviation
> > itself was constrained by the old file names. But there are
> > many cases where standard short name is quite convenient -
> > especially for use by expert users in the Axiom interpreter
> Localization of software is not so easy. If I just take the above
> mentioned file and translate it into German, I am sure that I will hate
> the German error message when I see one. The reason is simple. In that
> file there is not enough information to come up with a reasonable
> translatio
On 02/15/2006 06:02 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I agree that the limitation on the length of the abbreviation
itself was constrained by the old file names. But there are
many cases where standard short name is quite convenient -
especially for use by expert
> Maybe I should have been a bit more precise. I actually already knew
> what )abbrev is for. I just forgot the syntax.
>
> As you see the first message tells me:
>
>Issue )abbrev? for more information.
>
> And if I do that I get a not so helpful message. That was the bug I was
> referring
I agree that the limitation on the length of the abbreviation
itself was constrained by the old file names. But there are
many cases where standard short name is quite convenient -
especially for use by expert users in the Axiom interpreter.
For example I often write: 'POLY INT' instead of
'Polyno
Ralf,
On Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:20 AM you wrote:
>
> Maybe I should have been a bit more precise. I actually
> already knew what )abbrev is for. I just forgot the syntax.
No problem.
>
> As you see the first message tells me:
>
>Issue )abbrev? for more information.
>
> And if I d
Hi Bill,
Maybe I should have been a bit more precise. I actually already knew
what )abbrev is for. I just forgot the syntax.
As you see the first message tells me:
Issue )abbrev? for more information.
And if I do that I get a not so helpful message. That was the bug I was
referring to.
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:14 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Can someone explain that ...
>
> (2) -> )abbr domain XYZ
> domain must be followed by an alternating list of abbreviation(s)
>and name(s). Issue )abbrev? for more information.
> (2) -> )abbrev?
> Your argument list is
)abbrev domain MYINT MyInteger
^^ domain name
abbreviation
see any pamphlet file in src/algebra
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axi
Can someone explain that ...
(2) -> )abbr domain XYZ
domain must be followed by an alternating list of abbreviation(s)
and name(s). Issue )abbrev? for more information.
(2) -> )abbrev?
Your argument list is not valid.
Very helpful! ;-)
Ralf
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
