[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cliff,
>
> We're not in the advertising business. We're doing long term science.
Maybe so, but a little word of mouth can't hurt. Consider the Ubuntu
phenomenon. ;)
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd prefer the binary numbering scheme to reflect the date
> of the gold version, so the Gold Sept 2007 version would be
>axiom-7.9.0.tgz
> (that is, Sept, 2007 == 7.9). This will be unique and clear.
Well ... OK ... but since we are looking for something to last the
Hi Tim,
> Linus Torvolds commented that he is constantly asked when "version 3.0"
> of linux will be released. He estimates that there will never be a
> version 3.0 and people don't like that answer.
Not for contradicting you, but his answer was because he does not expect
for Linux to break API c
Cliff,
We're not in the advertising business. We're doing long term science.
It makes no difference if there are "major" improvements from version
10.1 to 10.2. Every version features improvements.
Linus Torvolds commented that he is constantly asked when "version 3.0"
of linux will be released.
I'd prefer the binary numbering scheme to reflect the date
of the gold version, so the Gold Sept 2007 version would be
axiom-7.9.0.tgz
(that is, Sept, 2007 == 7.9). This will be unique and clear.
We need to put up binary distros on the axiom websites
(axiom-developer, sourceforge, savannah). Th
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As part of recovery of the project I am going back to the schedule
> of Gold releases every 2 months.
Tim, the schedule sounds good. Would you object to a Major.Minor
numbering scheme for Gold to make things "distro-friendly?" E.g.
Sept 1, 2007: axiom-4.9.0.tar.
> Sounds like a plan ... I just started the build so it will be morning
> before I know if it worked. Meanwhile, when is the next scheduled
> "migration" of Silver to Golden? I'm trying to get Gentoo to replace the
> September 2005 tarball they have now with something newer.
Axiom's last Gold rele
I suppose I can find out the hard way, but in case anyone knows:
Is the source currently in the Gold tree the same as that in the Sept.
2005 tarball that already exists?
Thanks,
CY
Luggage? GPS? Comic b
On Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:32 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>
> root wrote:
> > quite curious that this code never worked and nobody noticed.
> >
>
> Nothing strange. Axiom contains a lot of unfinished code (or even
> pure junk) and this is one more such piece. I would not say that
> nobody
root wrote:
> quite curious that this code never worked and nobody noticed.
>
Nothing strange. Axiom contains a lot of unfinished code (or even
pure junk) and this is one more such piece. I would not say that
nobody noticed -- my experience tells me that most users do not
bother reporting bugs.
> > in gold/src/hyper/search.pamphlet
> > {
> > a[n] = $0;
> > n=n+1;
> > j=split($0,b,"{");
> > m=m+substr(b[j],1,length(b[j])-1);
> > }
> >
> > but in sandbox it reads:
> > {
> > a[n] = $0;
> > n=n+1;
> > j=split($0,b,"{");
> > if (j >= 2)
> >
> in gold/src/hyper/search.pamphlet
> {
> a[n] = $0;
> n=n+1;
> j=split($0,b,"{");
> m=m+substr(b[j],1,length(b[j])-1);
> }
>
> but in sandbox it reads:
> {
> a[n] = $0;
> n=n+1;
> j=split($0,b,"{");
> if (j >= 2)
> m=m+substr(b[2]
> What is "sandbox"? Where can I find this code?
sorry, "sandbox" is wh-sandbox in svn on sourceforge.
as near as i can determine it is a branch off build-improvements.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.
On November 27, 2006 9:01 PM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> in gold/src/hyper/search.pamphlet
> {
> a[n] = $0;
> n=n+1;
> j=split($0,b,"{");
> m=m+substr(b[j],1,length(b[j])-1);
> }
>
> but in sandbox it reads:
> {
> a[n] = $0;
> n=n+1;
> j=split($0,b,"{");
>
in gold/src/hyper/search.pamphlet
{
a[n] = $0;
n=n+1;
j=split($0,b,"{");
m=m+substr(b[j],1,length(b[j])-1);
}
but in sandbox it reads:
{
a[n] = $0;
n=n+1;
j=split($0,b,"{");
if (j >= 2)
m=m+substr(b[2],1,length(b[2])-1);
}
No, no, I think we all agree now. The confusion appeared because it is
not really clear, what is meant, if somebody speaks of gold or silver.
So to make it clear now.
*Gold*: The latest release of axiom--main--1--patch-??
*Silver* = *Gold-to-be* =https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/axiom/trunk
Hello,
In the page http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomSources, it is
written : "the stable release is avaiblable either via a direct source
tarball or via access to CVS or TLA archives. You find more details at
AxiomGoldBranch" but where is/are the source tarball(s)? It could be a
good idea to a
17 matches
Mail list logo
