I did some thinking about a graph theory package. If anybody
is interested, I can write up what I believe after November
19.
I would of cource also be interested in what you believe about
graph theory before November 19. :-)
Is humour based on English ambiguity too obvious?
No. I think that
On November 9, 2006 8:25 AM Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> > Bill Pag wrote:
> > | If anyone else is interested in discussing the development
> > | and use of a graph theory package for Axiom, I would be
> > | very glad to hear from you.
> >
> ...
> Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm i
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | If anyone else is interested in discussing the development and
> | use of a graph theory package for Axiom, I would be very glad
> | to hear from you.
>
> I'm interested in a graph theory package for Axiom (but I have no immediate
> interest in gra
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Axiom Developers;
|
| Over a year ago we were discussing how best to represent Axiom's
| algebra dependency graph. This is a complex problem because Axiom
| has over 1,300 mathematically modules that are tightly integrated
| with each other - even to the
Axiom Developers;
Over a year ago we were discussing how best to represent Axiom's
algebra dependency graph. This is a complex problem because Axiom
has over 1,300 mathematically modules that are tightly integrated
with each other - even to the point of generating a large number
cyclical dependenc
