On August 14, 2006 3:04 PM William Sit wrote:
> ...
> BTW, there is an error in [SandBoxNewAutodocPamphlet]:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last): File
> "/var/zope/Products/ZWiki/plugins/Fit.py", line 29, in ? from
> fit.Parse
> import Parse ImportError: No module named fit.Parse
>
> The file
Hello,
As Bill, I think hard-coded modification date is preferable, as it
allows minor modification (e.g. fixing typo). Of course, it depends on
the semantics you espect on the date.
William Sit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Come to think of it, each pamphlet file should include a revision
> his
Bill Page wrote:
>
> On August 14, 2006 2:13 AM William Sit wrote:
> >
> > When a pamphlet file is rendered, the date of the pdf file is always
> > \today. That seems to be misleading, as many of the source files have
> > not been updated for ages.
>
> I think the use of \today in the LaTeX sou
On August 14, 2006 2:13 AM William Sit wrote:
>
> When a pamphlet file is rendered, the date of the pdf file is always
> \today. That seems to be misleading, as many of the source files have
> not been updated for ages.
I think the use of \today in the LaTeX source is inappropriate unless
for som
