On Friday, October 27, 2006 12:07 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> On 10/27/2006 05:28 PM, Bill Page wrote:
> > On Friday, October 27, 2006 11:06 AM Tim Daly wrote:
> >> Bill Page wrote: [new /silver root at SourceForge]
> > ...
> > Yes, I thought about that. That is another reason why I decided
> > no
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| I agree that build-improvements is rapidly gaining distance
| on /trunk and Axiom Gold. In my opinion (but I don't know how
| Gaby feels about this), build-improvements is now nearly stable
| enough to be merged back.
There are a couple of issues
On 10/27/2006 05:28 PM, Page, Bill wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2006 11:06 AM Tim Daly wrote:
Bill Page wrote: [new /silver root at SourceForge]
Let me know what you think of this arrangement.
You do realize that this leaves the build-improvement branch
as a true fork since it is no longer "r
> >
> > Your automatic procedure should show the top entry in CHANGELOG
> > of:
>
> Looks ok to me:
>
> http://axiom.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/axiom/silver/CHANGELOG?revision=
> 218&view=markup
>
> ...
>
> Original author: Tim Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006-10-26 15:16:20-04:00
>
>
Tim,
On Friday, October 27, 2006 11:06 AM you wrote:
>
> Your automatic procedure should show the top entry in CHANGELOG
> of:
>
> 20061026 tpd src/interp/setq.lisp add Christian Aistleitner
>
> If this is NOT the top entry then something is broken.
>
Looks ok to me:
http://axiom.svn.source
On Friday, October 27, 2006 11:06 AM Tim Daly wrote:
> Bill Page wrote: [new /silver root at SourceForge]
> > Let me know what you think of this arrangement.
>
> You do realize that this leaves the build-improvement branch
> as a true fork since it is no longer "rooted" at axiom49 in
> the SVN tre
