[Axiom-developer] Re: [NOT :-)] Time to say good bye to Tim.

2007-07-16 Thread William Sit
Dear All: It appears to me that there has been quite a lot of misunderstandings among the regulars. At least, I have misunderstood Tim and I have publicly used adjectives on him that are inaccurate (narrow-minded, slow, inflexible, and having an ego). For these inaccuracies, I might have added to,

[Axiom-developer] Re: [NOT :-)] Time to say good bye to Tim.

2007-07-15 Thread Martin Rubey
Sorry, I forgot to mention two things, lest somebody follows your argumentation: > If Waldek, Gaby and Bill leave entirely, what would happen? First they need > to re-establish the entire data-base for the website and create a new one. No. Ralf has already agreed to me that it would be possible t

[Axiom-developer] Re: [NOT :-)] Time to say good bye to Tim.

2007-07-15 Thread Martin Rubey
Dear William, thanks for your long reply. However, it seems to me that you missed that Tim submitted patches yesterday (and several times before) that * break the system * are not documented * and against which several people (yesterday: Ralf and myself) protested against *before* Tim commit

[Axiom-developer] Re: [NOT :-)] Time to say good bye to Tim.

2007-07-15 Thread William Sit
Dear Martin: Thanks for your trust in me and I also value your deep investment in the Axiom project and don't want to see you (or anyone else) leave. I am truly sorry that the community has split up like this, all due to my naive believe that Tim was willing to really do according to a "vote" on