Camm,
On Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:31 PM you asked:
>
> Greetings! Just going through old mail -- can we use expanded
> maxpages now?
>
Yes the maxpage parameter seems to be working as promised! :)
Thank you.
Regards,
Bill Page.
>
> Bill Page writes:
>
> > On Thursday, August 10, 2006
Greetings! Just going through old mail -- can we use expanded
maxpages now?
Take care,
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:05 PM I wrote:
>
> > ...
> > I edited the GCLOPTS in Makefile from
> > --enable-maxpage=256*1024
> > to
> > --enable-maxpage=19
Greetings! Hope you got my last message regarding the directory
deletion fixes, etc.
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> Thanks Camm! My test build just completed using the option
>
> --disable-xgcl
>
> On August 18, 2006 5:26 PM you wrote:
> >
> > OK, this one is my fault, a
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Here is a
|
| svn -diff
|
| of my working copy with the accummulated patches
|
| http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/public/camm-patches-2.6.8pre.txt
|
| Will this work for you?
Many thanks. This is exactly what I was looking for.
| You will also nee
Gaby,
On Saturday, August 19, 2006 2:23 PM you wrote:
>
> Bill Page writes:
>
> | On August 19, 2006 9:51 AM Gaby wrote:
> | > ...
> | > OK; so let's me summarize a candidate patch for axiom.silver or
> | > axiom.build-improvements:
> | >
> | >* apparently, GCL 2.6.8pre from CVS has more i
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On August 19, 2006 9:51 AM Gaby wrote:
| > ...
| > OK; so let's me summarize a candidate patch for axiom.silver or
| > axiom.build-improvements:
| >
| >* apparently, GCL 2.6.8pre from CVS has more improvements;
| >* if we grab that, we must patch
On August 19, 2006 9:51 AM Gaby wrote:
> ...
> OK; so let's me summarize a candidate patch for axiom.silver or
> axiom.build-improvements:
>
>* apparently, GCL 2.6.8pre from CVS has more improvements;
>* if we grab that, we must patch Axiom with patches suggested
> by Camm. Camm, co
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Camm,
|
| Thanks Camm! My test build just completed using the option
|
| --disable-xgcl
Yay!
[...]
| > In the meantime, --disable-xgcl should work. Please let me know
| > if not.
| >
|
| It did. Thanks again.
OK; so let's me summarize a candidate
Camm,
Thanks Camm! My test build just completed using the option
--disable-xgcl
On August 18, 2006 5:26 PM you wrote:
>
> OK, this one is my fault, as I fogot we were still using EXTRAS
> in the makefile here. 2.6.8pre incorporates Gordon Novak's xgcl,
> and the way I build it was using compil
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On August 18, 2006 4:05 PM Gaby wrote:
| >
| > | On August 18, 2006 2:34 PM Camm wrote:
| > | > What should I do to work around to reproduce Bill's bug?
| > | >
| > |
| > Bill Page writes:
| > | apt-get install noweb ? :)
| >
| > yes, that may solve hi
Greetings!
OK, this one is my fault, as I fogot we were still using EXTRAS in the
makefile here. 2.6.8pre incorporates Gordon Novak's xgcl, and the way
I build it was using compiler::link from within lisp as it was
simpler. This overrides EXTRAS at the very end, as it copies the
compiler::link g
On August 18, 2006 4:05 PM Gaby wrote:
>
> | On August 18, 2006 2:34 PM Camm wrote:
> | > What should I do to work around to reproduce Bill's bug?
> | >
> |
> Bill Page writes:
> | apt-get install noweb ? :)
>
> yes, that may solve his immediate issue. However, while
> I understand how his bui
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Camm,
|
| On August 18, 2006 2:34 PM you wrote:
| >
| > Greetings, and thanks! I'm just after Bill's directoryp relocation
| > error at the moment, and have a ton of other items on the plate.
|
| I really appreciate you taking the time to look at this.
Thank you! Off and running ...
Take care,
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> On August 18, 2006 2:34 PM you wrote:
> >
> > Greetings, and thanks! I'm just after Bill's directoryp relocation
> > error at the moment, and have a ton of other items on the plate.
>
> I really ap
Camm,
On August 18, 2006 2:34 PM you wrote:
>
> Greetings, and thanks! I'm just after Bill's directoryp relocation
> error at the moment, and have a ton of other items on the plate.
I really appreciate you taking the time to look at this.
> What should I do to work around to reproduce Bill's b
Greetings, and thanks! I'm just after Bill's directoryp relocation
error at the moment, and have a ton of other items on the plate. What
should I do to work around to reproduce Bill's bug?
Take care,
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>
> | configure:2892: checking for notan
[...]
| configure:2892: checking for notangle
| configure:2921: result: no
| configure:2927: checking for noweave
| configure:2956: result: no
[...]
| ## - ##
| ## Output variables. ##
| ## - ##
[...]
| NOTANGLE=''
| NOWEAVE=''
OK, I got it. You don't noweb
Greetings, and thanks!
=
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
It was created by Axiom silver branch configure 2006-07-15, which was
g
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Greetings! I seem to be missing some dependency:
|
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/fix/t1/camm/debian/axiom/build-improvements'
| /bin/sh: t8: command not found
| make[1]: [do-all] Error 127 (ignored)
| /fix/t1/camm/debian/axiom/build-improvements/build/
looks like there is a place where a ${NOTANGLE} symbol is not defined.
the -t8 -delay are options on that command.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Greetings! I seem to be missing some dependency:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/fix/t1/camm/debian/axiom/build-improvements'
/bin/sh: t8: command not found
make[1]: [do-all] Error 127 (ignored)
/fix/t1/camm/debian/axiom/build-improvements/build/scripts/document: line 23:
-t8: command not found
/fi
Camm,
On Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:05 PM you wrote:
>
> "Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > With your patch below applied to the current Silver version
> > of Axiom with the modified gcl-2.6.8pre pulled from cvs,
> > I get a different result, but an error persists:
> >
> > $tai
Greetings!
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> With your patch below applied to the current Silver version
> of Axiom with the modified gcl-2.6.8pre pulled from cvs,
> I get a different result, but an error persists:
>
> $tail -18 build3.log
>
> Loading /home/page/axiom.buil
Tim,
On Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:55 PM you wrote:
>
> patches applied. testing restarted. --t
>
Do you recall that this patch also involves a new version of
gcl-2.6.8pre? I am not sure whether the patch is applicable to
the older version of gcl-2.6.8pre in the Axiom repositories.
Regards,
B
patches applied. testing restarted. --t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Camm,
With your patch below applied to the current Silver version
of Axiom with the modified gcl-2.6.8pre pulled from cvs,
I get a different result, but an error persists:
$tail -18 build3.log
Loading /home/page/axiom.build-improvements/obj/linux/interp/cformat.o
start address -T 0x857a700 Fin
Greetings!
--- axiom-20050901.orig/src/interp/cfuns.lisp.pamphlet
+++ axiom-20050901/src/interp/cfuns.lisp.pamphlet
@@ -103,10 +103,10 @@
#+(AND KCL (NOT ELF))
(Clines
-"unsigned int MYCOMBINE(i,j)"
-"unsigned int i,j;"
+"int MYCOMBINE(i,j)"
+"int i,j;"
"{"
-"return ( (((j & 16777215) << 6)+i
Camm,
> I had to make the following modifications to 20050901 to work with the
> latest 2.6.8pre:
Axiom has had several releases since 20050901.
What do we need to do to bring it up to date?
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.o
Le vendredi 11 août 2006 à 10:23 -0400, Camm Maguire a écrit :
> Greetings!
>
> I had to make the following modifications to 20050901 to work with the
> latest 2.6.8pre:
>
> /fix/t1/camm/debian/axiom/axiom-20050901/int/interp/hash.lisp: remove static
So it seems that it's no longer necessary to
Greetings!
I had to make the following modifications to 20050901 to work with the
latest 2.6.8pre:
/fix/t1/camm/debian/axiom/axiom-20050901/int/interp/hash.lisp: remove static
(clines "int mem_value(x ,i)object x;int i; { return ((short *)x)[i];}")
#+AKCL
(defentry memory-value-short(object int)
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:05 PM I wrote:
> ...
> I edited the GCLOPTS in Makefile from
> --enable-maxpage=256*1024
> to
> --enable-maxpage=196*1024
> resulting in
>
> GCLOPTS=--enable-vssize=65536*2 --enable-statsysbfd \
> --enable-maxpage=196*1024
>
Of course what I real
Camm,
On Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:59 PM you wrote:
>
> Greetings! FYI, just committed the removal of the
> power of 2 constraint on maxpage in both cvs head and
> version 2.6.8pre.
>
Thanks for looking into this.
I just grabbed 2.6.8pre from cvs into a temp directory and
created a replace
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Greetings! FYI, just committed the removal of the power of 2
| constraint on maxpage in both cvs head and version 2.6.8pre.
That is good news!
Thanks,
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-develop
Greetings! FYI, just committed the removal of the power of 2
constraint on maxpage in both cvs head and version 2.6.8pre.
Take care,
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Camm,
>
> On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:21 PM you wrote:
> > ...
> > Bill Page wrote:
> > >
> > > NULL_OR_ON_C_S
Greetings!
I have a trial version there now which eliminates the power of two
constraint. Am testing locally before committing, but you might want
to too. The issue here, as you recall, is that your machine for some
reason is placing the stack below the 0x4000 mark. I could get a
build with
35 matches
Mail list logo
