Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > There is yet another issue: It seems that latex -source-specials puts
| > | > the absolute path of the original file into the dvi. I guess that at
| > | > least kdvi won't mind for forward search (i.e., when clicking on
| > | > INT.spad in HyperDoc
| > There is yet another issue: It seems that latex -source-specials puts
| > the absolute path of the original file into the dvi. I guess that at
| > least kdvi won't mind for forward search (i.e., when clicking on
| > INT.spad in HyperDoc the correct line will appear),
|
| I don't quite underst
On Friday, October 27, 2006 11:05 AM Martin Rubey wrote:
> ...
> But really, we should be firing up the dvi viewer with the
> literate source. If you really want the source code itself,
> you then just press the middle button in the dvi viewer.
>
Yes! +1
Ideally the editor that is invoked by the
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > We could also display the dvi, but then src/scripts/document would
> | > have to call latex with "-src-specials" or, if that is not available,
> | > we would have to include the file srcltx in every p
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > We could also display the dvi, but then src/scripts/document would
| > have to call latex with "-src-specials" or, if that is not available,
| > we would have to include the file srcltx in every pamphlet.
|
| Would it be an option to say \usepackage{s
Well, I just checked. A dvi generated with -src-specials does *not*
contain the absolute paths. It is only kdvi which gives a misleading
error message. I was confused. To jump to line 795 of Makefile.tex in
Makefile.dvi you say
Note that sometimes the full path is what you want. Imagine you prod
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We could also display the dvi, but then src/scripts/document would have to
> > call latex with "-src-specials" or, if that is not available, we would have
> > to include the file srcltx in every pamphlet.
>
> Would it be an option to say \usepackage{s
We could also display the dvi, but then src/scripts/document would
have to call latex with "-src-specials" or, if that is not available,
we would have to include the file srcltx in every pamphlet.
Would it be an option to say \usepackage{srcltx} in axiom.sty?
srcltx.sty is public domain software
