axiom-developer@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: Suggestion
>
>
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomBinaries
>
> The page does need some reorganization.
>
> Something similar to your table concept, I was thinking of having
> at the beginning of the page so
> > entries in the table can point to the same binaries if they
> > work across multiple platforms so there is no need for a
> > page per table entry.
>
> but then, where are the release notes going to be placed?
place the release note link in the same box as the binary thus:
--
On 11/5/06, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, clearly i think the table organization is clearer :-)
the advantage is that you can see at a glance which binaries
are available, which are downlevel, and which are missing.
that way we can direct efforts at making binaries.
Ok.
entries in the
well, clearly i think the table organization is clearer :-)
the advantage is that you can see at a glance which binaries
are available, which are downlevel, and which are missing.
that way we can direct efforts at making binaries.
entries in the table can point to the same binaries if they
work ac
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomBinaries
The page does need some reorganization.
Something similar to your table concept, I was thinking of having
at the beginning of the page some kind of index like:
Axiom Binaries
1. Linux
2. Debian
3. Fedora
4. Redhat
5. OS X (PPC)
6. OS X (Intel)
7. W
Bill,
Did you ever add the asq setup?
I don't see it anywhere.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Bill, Alfredo,
I might suggest that we reorganize a portion of the axiom binary
page to use a table form. I placed a mockup at
http://daly.axiom-developer.org/axiombinary
That way we can not only keep track of which binaries are current
for a given platform but we can provide release notes (e.g.
On 11/5/06, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On November 5, 2006 12:52 AM Alfredo Portes asked:
> ...
> > I agree that BuildAxiom is the right place to add the build
> > procedure for OS X. Feel free ... :-)
>
> I will. I emailed Humberto to see if he can write the steps...
>
> what is the st
On November 5, 2006 12:52 AM Alfredo Portes asked:
> ...
> > I agree that BuildAxiom is the right place to add the build
> > procedure for OS X. Feel free ... :-)
>
> I will. I emailed Humberto to see if he can write the steps...
>
> what is the status of Axiom on Windows, maybe I should look i
Alfredo,
On November 5, 2006 12:36 AM you wrote:
> ...
> But what about:
>
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/BuildAxiom
>
> This looks like a very important page, especially to add the new
> procedure to build on OS X. I think there should be way to get this
> content.
>
Both AxiomBinaries an
On November 4, 2006 11:40 PM Alfredo Portes wrote:
>
> I have a little suggestion about MathAction frontpage.
>
> I think the link Download should point to:
>
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomBinaries
>
> having here the different binaries for the platforms.
>
> then the link Executables
11 matches
Mail list logo
