Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] | I don't understand the fundamental change that was made to the | build system (autoconf). I really need to understand it because | I build it and modify it on a regular basis. The only viable path | will be for Gaby to extract, document, test, and export the | ch

Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-28 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
3. Silver is moving from arch to Git There is no need to be concerned because silver is also available in SVN format on sourceforge. And as I understand correctly, Silver (or silver mirror) = Sourceforge:branches/daly On sourceforge we have now branches/ silver/ tags/ trunk/ In order

[Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-27 Thread daly
Cliff, > I was under the impression we were going to the following for > "official" use: > Silver: GIT/svn > Gold: CVS That's not incorrect, just incomplete. I'm not sure we need to mention silver outside the mailing list but that's up to you. > ARCH is not undergoing active developmen

[Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-27 Thread daly
Cliff, > 1. What are the "approved" sources for AxiomGold? I am assuming CVS > on Savannah and Sourceforge? The "master" copy lives in Arch on axiom-developer.org. It is mirrored to CVS on Sourceforge and CVS on Savannah. The outside, non-developer world seems mostly to be CVS. > 2. Is the mos

[Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-27 Thread daly
Bill, > I fear that since build-improvements is cloned from the current > trunk and wh-sandbox is cloned from build-improvements, there > might be some considerable loss in "mergibility" if we were to > just "pull the rug out from under them" so as to speak and > wholesale replace trunk with the c

Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-27 Thread C Y
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I believe we should list them all. Each developer has a choice of the > source code control mechanism that fits his needs and interests. > Gaby and Waldek seem to like SVN. Bill likes Darcs. The silver version > uses SVN/git. The main gold version will continue us

[Axiom-developer] Re: Which source distributions should we list?

2007-05-27 Thread daly
Ralf, > Which source distributions should we list? I believe we should list them all. Each developer has a choice of the source code control mechanism that fits his needs and interests. Gaby and Waldek seem to like SVN. Bill likes Darcs. The silver version uses SVN/git. The main gold version wil